FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333  
334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   >>  
d upward to the surface. This view is supported by many careful observations on the effect which certain great earthquakes have exercised on the buildings which they have ravaged. The distinguished observer, Mr. Charles Mallet, who visited the seat of the earthquake which, in 1854, occurred in the province of Calabria in Italy, with great labour and skill determined the direction in which the shock moved through some hundreds of edifices on which it left the marks of its passage. Platting these lines of motion, he found that they were all referred to a vertical plane lying at the depth of some miles beneath the surface, and extending for a great distance in a north and south direction. This method of inquiry has been applied to other fields, with the result that in the case of all the instances which have been subjected to this inquiry the seat of the shock has been traced to such a plane, which can best be accounted for by the supposition of a fault. The method pursued by Mr. Mallet in his studies of the origin of earthquakes, and by those who have continued his inquiry, may be briefly indicated as follows: Examining disrupted buildings, it is easy to determine those which have been wrecked by a shock that emerged from the earth in a vertical direction. In these cases, though tall walls may remain standing, the roofs and floors are thrown into the cellars. With a dozen such instances the plane of what is called the seismic vertical is established (_seismos_ is the Greek for earthquake). Then on either side of this plane, which indicates the line but not the depth of the disturbance, other observations may be made which give the clew to the depth. Thus a building may be found where the northwest corner at its upper part has been thrown off. Such a rupture was clearly caused by an upward but oblique movement, which in the first half of the oscillation heaved the structure upwardly into the northwest, and then in the second half, or rebound, drew the mass of the building away from the unsupported corner, allowing that part of the masonry to fly off and fall to the ground. Constructing a line at right angles to the plane of the fracture, it will be found to intersect the plane, the position of which has been in part determined by finding the line where it intersects the earth, or the seismic vertical before noted. Multiplying such observations on either side of the last-mentioned line, the attitude of the underground par
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   327   328   329   330   331   332   333  
334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   >>  



Top keywords:

vertical

 

direction

 
inquiry
 

observations

 

earthquakes

 

buildings

 
upward
 
building
 

instances

 

method


northwest
 
surface
 
corner
 

determined

 

seismic

 

earthquake

 
thrown
 

Mallet

 

cellars

 

underground


disturbance

 

established

 

seismos

 

called

 

oblique

 

allowing

 

masonry

 

intersects

 

unsupported

 

rebound


finding

 

fracture

 

position

 

angles

 

ground

 
Constructing
 
caused
 

intersect

 

mentioned

 

attitude


movement
 
structure
 

upwardly

 

heaved

 

Multiplying

 

oscillation

 
rupture
 

passage

 
edifices
 

hundreds