FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   >>  
e might take her authoritatively and by virtue of his royalty, and one of them even went and told this to the lady, who repeated it to her husband. The advocate clearly perceived that he and his wife must needs quit the kingdom, and that he would indeed find it hard to escape without obeying. Finally the husband gave his wife leave to comply with the King's desire, and in order that he might be no hindrance in the matter, he pretended to have business in the country for eight or ten days; during which time, however, he remained concealed in Paris, frequenting the brothels and trying to contract a venereal disease in order to give it to his wife, so that the King might catch it from her; and he speedily found what he sought, and infected his wife and she the King, who gave it to several other women, whom he kept, and could never get thoroughly cured, for all the rest of his life he remained unhealthy, sad, peevish and inaccessible." Brantome, it may be mentioned, also speaks of the King contracting a complaint through his gallantries, and declares that it shortened his life, but he mentions no woman by name, and does not tell the story of the advocate's wife. It will have been observed in the extract we have quoted that Guyon de la Nauthe says that the advocate had left children "in possession of high estate and good repute." Disome, however, had no children either by his first or his second wife. The question therefore arises whether La Nauthe is not referring to another advocate, for instance Le Feron, husband of La belle Feronniere. These would appear to have left posterity (see _Catalogue de tous les Conseillers du Parlement de Paris_, pp. 120-2-3, and Blanchard's _les Presidents a mortier du Parlement de Paris, etc_., 1647, 8vo). But it should be borne in mind that the Feronniere intrigue is purely traditional. The modern writers who speak of it content themselves with referring to Mezeray, a very doubtful authority at most times, and who did not write, it should be remembered, till the middle of the seventeenth century, his _Abrege Chronologique_ being first published in 1667. Moreover, when we come to consult him we find that he merely makes a passing allusion to La Feronniere, and even this is of the most dubious kind. Here are his words: "In 1538 the King had a long illness at Compiegne, caused by an ulcer.... He was cured at the time, but died [of it?] nine years later. _I have sometimes heard say_(!) that he
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   >>  



Top keywords:
advocate
 

Feronniere

 

husband

 
referring
 

remained

 

Parlement

 

Nauthe

 

children

 

Blanchard

 

Presidents


mortier

 
question
 

Catalogue

 
instance
 
arises
 

posterity

 

intrigue

 

Conseillers

 

Mezeray

 

consult


Moreover

 

passing

 

allusion

 

illness

 

Compiegne

 
dubious
 

published

 

caused

 

doubtful

 

authority


content

 

traditional

 
modern
 

writers

 

Disome

 

century

 

Abrege

 

Chronologique

 

seventeenth

 

middle


remembered
 
purely
 

country

 

business

 

desire

 
hindrance
 

matter

 
pretended
 
concealed
 

frequenting