FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83  
84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   >>   >|  
may be found the explanations, or precise definitions, of almost all the names--with the exception of the following, added here for the sake of brevity--skoliophasia, skoliophrasia, and palimphrasia. On the other hand, the statements concerning the speech of the child rest on my own observations of children--especially of my own son--and readers who give their attention to little children may verify them all; most of them, indeed, with ease. Only the examples added for explaining mogilalia and paralalia are taken in part from Sigismund, a few others from Vierordt. They show more plainly (at least concerning rhotacism) than my own notes, some imperfections of articulation of the child in the second year, which occur, however, only in single individuals. In general the defects of child-speech are found to be very unequally distributed among different ages and individuals, so that we can hardly expect to find all the speech-disturbances of adults manifested in typical fashion in one and the same child. But with very careful observation it may be done, notwithstanding; and when several children are compared with one another in this respect, the analogies fairly force themselves upon the observer, and there is no break anywhere. The whole group into which I have tried to bring in organic connection all the kinds of disturbances and defects of speech in systematic form falls into three divisions: 1. Imperfections not occasioned by disturbance of the intelligence--pure speech-disturbances or _lalopathies_. 2. Imperfections occasioned solely by disturbances of the intelligence--disturbances of continuous speech or discourse (Rede)--_dysphrasies_. 3. Imperfections of the language of gesture and feature--_dysmimies_. I. LALOPATHY. A. THE IMPRESSIVE PERIPHERAL PROCESSES DISTURBED. _Deafness._--Persons able to speak but who have become deaf do not understand what is spoken simply because they can _no longer_ hear. The newly born do not understand what is spoken because they can _not yet_ hear. The paths _o_ and _a_ are not yet practicable. All those just born are deaf and dumb. _Difficulty of Hearing._--Persons who have become hard of hearing do not understand what is spoken, or they misunderstand, because they _no longer_ hear distinctly. Such individuals easily hear wrong (paracusis). Very young infants do not understand what is spoken, for the reason that they do _not yet_ hear distinctly; _o_ and _a_ are sti
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   78   79   80   81   82   83  
84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
speech
 
disturbances
 
spoken
 
understand
 

children

 

Imperfections

 

individuals

 

defects

 

occasioned

 

intelligence


Persons

 

distinctly

 

longer

 

systematic

 

hearing

 

disturbance

 

misunderstand

 
connection
 
easily
 

divisions


reason

 

observer

 
paracusis
 

infants

 

organic

 

PROCESSES

 
DISTURBED
 

Deafness

 

PERIPHERAL

 
IMPRESSIVE

practicable

 
LALOPATHY
 

dysmimies

 

solely

 
continuous
 

lalopathies

 

simply

 

Difficulty

 

discourse

 

gesture


feature

 
language
 
dysphrasies
 

Hearing

 

fashion

 

examples

 

verify

 

attention

 

explaining

 
mogilalia