FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263  
264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   >>   >|  
. Chase would have been a far stronger candidate than Greeley. However any political antagonist might dislike him, every antagonist must respect him, and nobody could laugh at him. The question of the constitutional power of Congress to make Treasury notes legal tender for all debts, whether incurred before or after they were issued, came up for the decision of the Court when Chase was Chief Justice. It was a question which profoundly interested and excited the public. The Democratic Party, which more lately favored the payment of all debts, public and private, in irredeemable paper money, had assailed the Republican Administration during the war for providing, under an alleged necessity that Treasury notes, called greenbacks, should be legal tender for the discharge of all debts. The constitutionality of that law had been affirmed by the courts of fifteen States. It had been denied by one court only, that of Kentucky, the eminent Chancellor dissenting. There was scarcely a Republican lawyer or a Republican judge in the country who doubted the constitutional power of Congress to impose such a quality upon the paper currency if, in the opinion of Congress, the public safety should require it. The question came before the Supreme Court of the United States in the case of Hepburn _v._ Griswold, and was decided by that Court in December, 1869. The Court were all agreed that Congress has power under the Constitution to do not only what the Constitution expressly authorizes, but to adopt any means appropriate, and plainly adapted to carry in to effect any such express power. So the two questions arose: First, Was the power to issue legal tender notes an appropriate, and plainly adapted means to any end which the National Government has a right to accomplish? Second, Who are to judge of the question whether the means be so appropriate, or plainly adapted? There were then seven Justices of the Supreme Court. Chief Justice Chase, with the three Democratic Justices held the Legal Tender Law unconstitutional, and declared that a law making anything but gold or silver legal tender for debts was neither appropriate nor plainly adapted to carrying on war, or any other end for which the National Government was erected. He had, when Secretary of the Treasury during the War of the Rebellion, originally advised the issuing of these legal tender notes. He had visited the Capitol. He had called members of the tw
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263  
264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
tender
 

question

 

Congress

 

adapted

 

plainly

 

Republican

 

Treasury

 

public

 

National

 
Justices

Democratic

 

Government

 

called

 

Supreme

 

Constitution

 

States

 

constitutional

 
antagonist
 
Justice
 
Second

questions

 

stronger

 

candidate

 

accomplish

 

expressly

 

authorizes

 

dislike

 

political

 
effect
 

express


However
 
Greeley
 

Secretary

 
Rebellion
 
erected
 
originally
 

advised

 

members

 
Capitol
 
visited

issuing
 

carrying

 

Tender

 
agreed
 
unconstitutional
 

silver

 

declared

 

making

 

necessity

 

incurred