FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172  
173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   >>   >|  
on, Washington, D.C._ Another communication bearing on the disposition of the salvage was received from Mr. Stevens, as follows: MARCH 23, 1905. DEAR SIR: At a meeting of the National Commission on the 20th the suggestion was made by a member of the Commission that the answer to allegation third did not fully cover the ground. The allegation and the answer were: That the exposition officials rejected higher bids than that of the Chicago House Wrecking Company, so that the latter might have further opportunity to raise its figures. Answer. No higher bid was received either before or after the sum of $450,000 had been agreed upon to be recommended by the committee on salvage. The purpose was to answer that no higher bid than that made by the Chicago House Wrecking Company was received either before; at the time, or after the sum of $450,000 had been agreed upon to be recommended by the committee on salvage. On the 30th of November, early in the day, the Chicago House Wrecking Company made a bid for $420,000. Up to that time and during that day the next highest bid was under $400,000. Late in the day, the 30th of November, the salvage committee, after conference with all bidders who presented themselves, made the proposition to the Chicago House Wrecking Company that if it would raise its bid from $420,000 to $450,000 the committee would recommend acceptance by the executive committee. Respectfully, WALTER B. STEVENS, _Secretary._ Mr. LAURENCE H. GRAHAME, _Secretary National Commission, Washington, D.C._ As a result of the inquiry instituted by the Commission into the disposal of the salvage, statements supported by affidavits were received and the same are appended to this report and marked "Appendix No. 2." Under the act of Congress the Commission had no power to undertake a more thorough investigation of the charges and allegations made in respect to the manner in which the salvage of the exposition had been disposed of. Without authority to send for persons and papers, to administer oaths, or to compel witnesses to testify, any further attempt upon the part of the Commission to inquire into the salvage matter would have been futile and ineffective. If any further action is to be taken to ascertain whether or not the financial interest of the United States has been sacrificed by
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172  
173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

salvage

 

Commission

 
committee
 

Company

 

Wrecking

 

received

 

Chicago

 

higher

 

answer

 

exposition


Washington

 

National

 

November

 

Secretary

 

agreed

 

recommended

 
allegation
 

investigation

 

statements

 

supported


affidavits

 

disposal

 

instituted

 

GRAHAME

 
result
 

inquiry

 

appended

 
Congress
 

undertake

 
report

marked
 
Appendix
 

Without

 

action

 

ineffective

 

futile

 

inquire

 
matter
 
ascertain
 

States


sacrificed

 
United
 
interest
 

financial

 

attempt

 

disposed

 
authority
 

manner

 

allegations

 

respect