FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163  
164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   >>   >|  
sed other bidders. Answer. No complete list was submitted to the Chicago House Wrecking Company or to any other bidder. The Exposition Company, through the salvage committee and the executive committee, with deliberate intent refused to furnish any list purporting to be complete. Fifth. That a written offer of $400,000 cash, and more, if lists could be secured, was ignored. Answer. No such offer was received. Sixth. That a bid of $450,000, half cash, was presented to the Exposition Company after the announcement of the sale of the salvage to the Chicago House Wrecking Company for $386,000. Answer. No such bid of $450,000 was received; the Chicago House Wrecking Company did not make a bid for $386,000. Seventh. That the contract was eventually given to the Chicago House Wrecking Company for $450,000, with contract provisions inferior to the former $450,000 bid made by a party outside the Chicago House Wrecking Company. Answer. This statement is not true. There had been no bid of $450,000 on any terms when the sale was closed. The contract provisions were superior to any made in the bids. Eighth. That the contract with the Chicago House Wrecking Company does not adequately protect the Government, the city of St. Louis, and the stockholders, the $40,000 bond being out of all proportion to the size of the sale. Answer. The bond of $40,000 was not taken to secure the payment of the $450,000, or any part of it. The first payment of $100,000 was made on the signing of the contract of sale. The remaining $350,000 was secured adequately by a mortgage on the property covered by the bill of sale. The $40,000 bond was required to enforce other conditions of the contract, namely, those relative to the wrecking and removal of the property under conditions of leases upon which the property stood. A part of the contract required that property be kept insured for the benefit of the Exposition Company until all payments were made. The bond covered these provisions. The Chicago House Wrecking Company made its second payment of $100,000 on February 1. The third payment will be due March 15. The company holds a mortgage on the property to secure the remaining payments, and only releases the property to the Chicago House Wrecking Company as the payments are made.
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163  
164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Company

 

Wrecking

 

Chicago

 

contract

 

property

 

Answer

 

payment

 

payments

 
provisions
 

Exposition


remaining
 

adequately

 

conditions

 
required
 

covered

 
mortgage
 
secure
 

received

 

salvage

 

committee


complete

 

secured

 
signing
 

company

 
proportion
 

releases

 

insured

 

leases

 
benefit
 

relative


removal

 

February

 

wrecking

 

enforce

 

announcement

 

presented

 

written

 

bidder

 
submitted
 
bidders

executive

 

deliberate

 

purporting

 

furnish

 

refused

 

intent

 

Seventh

 

eventually

 

superior

 

closed