FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52  
53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>   >|  
s house to open the parcel (within which was a cover stamped and directed to myself) and return it to me. This servant, I suppose, opened the box and dropped the glass tube on a stone floor, and perhaps put his foot on it, for the tube and shell were broken into quite small fragments. These were returned to me with no explanation, the box being quite uninjured. I suppose you would not care for the fragments to be returned or the Dytiscus; but if you wish for them they shall be returned. I am very sorry, but it has not been my fault. It seems to me almost useless to send the fragments of the shell to the British Museum to be named, more especially as the umbo has been lost. It is many years since I have looked at a fresh-water shell, but I should have said that the shell was Cyclas cornea. (402/1. It was Cyclas cornea.) Is Sphaenium corneum a synonym of Cyclas? Perhaps you could tell by looking to Mr. G. Jeffreys' book. If so, may we venture to call it so, or shall I put an (?) to the name? As soon as I hear from you I will send my letter to "Nature." Do you take in "Nature," or shall I send you a copy? CHAPTER 2.VIII.--MAN. I. Descent of Man.--II. Sexual Selection.--III. Expression of the Emotions. 2.VIII.I. DESCENT OF MAN, 1860-1882. LETTER 403. TO C. LYELL. Down, April 27th [1860]. I cannot explain why, but to me it would be an infinite satisfaction to believe that mankind will progress to such a pitch that we should [look] back at [ourselves] as mere Barbarians. I have received proof-sheets (with a wonderfully nice letter) of very hostile review by Andrew Murray, read before the Royal Society of Edinburgh. (403/1. "On Mr. Darwin's Theory of the Origin of Species," by Andrew Murray. "Proc. Roy. Soc., Edinb." Volume IV., pages 274-91, 1862. The review concludes with the following sentence: "I have come to be of opinion that Mr. Darwin's theory is unsound, and that I am to be spared any collision between my inclination and my convictions" (referring to the writer's belief in Design).) But I am tired with answering it. Indeed I have done nothing the whole day but answer letters. LETTER 404. TO L. HORNER. (404/1. The following letter occurs in the "Memoir of Leonard Horner, edited by his daughter Katherine M. Lyell," Volume II., page 300 (privately printed, 1890).) Down, March 20th [1861]. I am very much obliged for your Address (404/2. Mr. Horner's Anniversary Address to the Geological
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52  
53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   76   77   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

fragments

 

returned

 
Cyclas
 

letter

 

Andrew

 
Murray
 

Nature

 

suppose

 

Horner

 

review


Darwin
 

Volume

 
cornea
 

Address

 

LETTER

 

progress

 

Species

 
Origin
 

mankind

 

wonderfully


sheets

 
Barbarians
 

hostile

 

received

 

Edinburgh

 
Society
 

Theory

 
spared
 
daughter
 

edited


Katherine
 

Leonard

 

Memoir

 

HORNER

 

occurs

 

obliged

 
Anniversary
 

Geological

 

privately

 

printed


letters

 

answer

 

satisfaction

 
collision
 
inclination
 

unsound

 

theory

 

concludes

 

sentence

 

opinion