FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290  
291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   >>   >|  
urnbull's to a cool stove to mature seed. I fully believe the case is worth investigation. P.S.--You will not have time at present to read my orchid book; I never before felt half so doubtful about anything which I published. When you read it, do not fear "punishing" me if I deserve it. Adios. I am come here to rest, which I much want. Whenever you have occasion to write, pray tell me whether you have Rhododendron Boothii from Bhootan, with a smallish yellow flower, and pistil bent the wrong way; if so, I would ask Oliver to look for nectary, for it is an abominable error of Nature that must be corrected. I could hardly believe my eyes when I saw the pistil. LETTER 624. TO ASA GRAY. January 19th [1863]. I have been at those confounded Melastomads again; throwing good money (i.e. time) after bad. Do you remember telling me you could see no nectar in your Rhexia? well, I can find none in Monochaetum, and Bates tells me that the flowers are in the most marked manner neglected by bees and lepidoptera in Amazonia. Now the curious projections or horns to the stamens of Monochaetum are full of fluid, and the suspicion occurs to me that diptera or small hymenoptera may puncture these horns like they puncture (proved since my orchid book was published) the dry nectaries of true Orchis. I forget whether Rhexia is common; but I very much wish you would next summer watch on a warm day a group of flowers, and see whether they are visited by small insects, and what they do. LETTER 625. TO I.A. HENRY. Down, January 20th [1863]. ...You must kindly permit me to mention any point on which I want information. If you are so inclined, I am curious to know from systematic experiments whether Mr. D. Beaton's statement that the pollen of two shortest anthers of scarlet Pelargonium produce dwarf plants (625/1. See "Animals and Plants," Edition II., Volume II., page 150, for a brief account of Darwin's experiments on this genus. Also loc. cit., page 338 (note), for a suggested experiment.), in comparison with plants produced from the same mother-plant by the pollen of longer stamens from the same flower. It would aid me much in some laborious experiments on Melastomads. I confess I feel a little doubtful; at least, I feel pretty nearly sure that I know the meaning of short stamens in most plants. This summer (for another object) I crossed Queen of Scarlet Pelargonium with pollen of long and short stamens of multiflora alba, and
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290  
291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

stamens

 

pollen

 

experiments

 

plants

 

pistil

 
flower
 

January

 

LETTER

 

Pelargonium

 
summer

puncture

 

flowers

 
Rhexia
 

curious

 

Melastomads

 

Monochaetum

 

published

 

orchid

 

doubtful

 
systematic

investigation

 

inclined

 

information

 

statement

 

anthers

 

scarlet

 

produce

 
shortest
 

Beaton

 

forget


common

 

visited

 

kindly

 

permit

 
insects
 

mention

 

Animals

 

pretty

 
confess
 
laborious

longer

 

meaning

 

Scarlet

 

multiflora

 

crossed

 

urnbull

 

object

 
mother
 

mature

 

account