FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277  
278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   >>   >|  
rove as rudimentary as that of Monacanthus relatively to Catasetum, I think I could easily perceive it even in dried specimens when well soaked. I have picked a little out of Lecoq, but it is awful tedious hunting. Bates is getting on with his natural history travels in one volume. (609/4. H.W. Bates, the "Naturalist on the Amazons," 1863. See Volume I., Letters 123, 148, also "Life and Letters," Volume II., page 381.) I have read the first chapter in MS., and I think it will be an excellent book and very well written; he argues, in a good and new way to me, that tropical climate has very little direct relation to the gorgeous colouring of insects (though of course he admits the tropics have a far greater number of beautiful insects) by taking all the few genera common to Britain and Amazonia, and he finds that the species proper to the latter are not at all more beautiful. I wonder how this is in species of the same restricted genera of plants. If you can remember it, thank Bentham for getting my Primula paper printed so quickly. I do enjoy getting a subject off one's hands completely. I have now got dimorphism in structure in eight natural orders just like Primula. Asa Gray sent me dried flowers of a capital case in Amsinkia spectabilis, one of the Boragineae. I suppose you do not chance to have the plant alive at Kew. LETTER 610. TO A.G. MORE. Down, June 7th, 1862. If you are well and have leisure, will you kindly give me one bit of information: Does Ophrys arachnites occur in the Isle of Wight? or do the intermediate forms, which are said to connect abroad this species and the bee-orchis, ever there occur? Some facts have led me to suspect that it might just be possible, though improbable in the highest degree, that the bee [orchis] might be the self-fertilising form of O. arachnites, which requires insects' aid, something [in the same way] as we have self-fertilising flowers of the violet and others requiring insects. I know the case is widely different, as the bee is borne on a separate plant and is incomparably commoner. This would remove the great anomaly of the bee being a perpetual self-fertiliser. Certain Malpighiaceae for years produce only one of the two forms. What has set my head going on this is receiving to-day a bee having one alone of the best marked characters of O. arachnites. (610/1. Ophrys arachnites is probably more nearly allied to O. aranifera than to O. apifera. For a case som
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271   272   273   274   275   276   277  
278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301   302   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

arachnites

 

insects

 

species

 

orchis

 
beautiful
 

fertilising

 

genera

 

flowers

 
Primula
 

Ophrys


Letters
 
Volume
 

natural

 

connect

 

Catasetum

 

abroad

 

degree

 

Monacanthus

 

rudimentary

 

highest


improbable
 

suspect

 

easily

 

LETTER

 

specimens

 

leisure

 
perceive
 
kindly
 

information

 
intermediate

receiving

 

produce

 
marked
 

apifera

 

aranifera

 
allied
 
characters
 

Malpighiaceae

 

widely

 

requiring


violet

 

separate

 

incomparably

 
perpetual
 

fertiliser

 
Certain
 

anomaly

 

commoner

 

remove

 
requires