FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   >>  
nal shape." Five days later the Governor of Newfoundland telegraphed to the Secretary of State:-- "My ministers request that incorrect statement made by Under-secretary of State for foreign affairs be immediately contradicted, _as the terms of modus vivendi were not modified in accordance with their views_. Ministers protested against any claims of French, and desired time to be changed till January for reasons given; but that was ignored, and _modus vivendi_ entered into without regard to their wishes. Ministers much embarrassed by incorrect statement made by Under-secretary of State." Of course the Secretary of State supported the statement of Sir James Ferguson, and refused to correct it. But on page 54 of the case for the colony, published June, 1890, we find the words:-- "Two facts are placed beyond dispute by the above-quoted correspondence: (1) that the consent of the 'community' of Newfoundland to the _modus vivendi_ was not obtained by laying it before the legislature, which the 'Labouchere' despatch declared to be the proper action to be taken in such cases; (2) and that even the government of Newfoundland was not consulted as to the adoption of the _modus vivendi_ as settled." The Labouchere despatch alluded to above, and called by the Newfoundlanders their "Magna Charta," had been sent by the Right Hon. Henry Labouchere on March 26, 1857. But Mr. Labouchere was not a Tory; and there is the whole difference. So Newfoundland still has to suffer for the criminal negligence which British Tories have displayed from 1743 until to-day. There was one Englishman, and that the Governor of Newfoundland itself, who had a clear and honorable notion of the imperial government's duty to its unfortunate colony. Sir G. William des Voeux, writing from the government House, St. John's, Jan. 14, 1887, to the Colonial Office in London, after reciting the circumstances, says: "If this be so, as indeed there are other reasons for believing, I would respectfully urge that in fairness the heavy resulting loss should not, or, at all events, not exclusively, fall upon this colony, and that if in the national interest a right is to be withheld from Newfoundland which naturally belongs to it, and the possession of which makes to it all the difference between wealth and penury, there is involved on the part of the nation a corresponding obligation to grant compensation of a value equal or nearly equal to that of the right
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   >>  



Top keywords:
Newfoundland
 

Labouchere

 

vivendi

 

colony

 

statement

 

government

 
Ministers
 

reasons

 

despatch

 

difference


secretary

 

incorrect

 

Governor

 

Secretary

 
unfortunate
 

writing

 

William

 

notion

 

British

 

Tories


Englishman
 

honorable

 

displayed

 
suffer
 
negligence
 

criminal

 

imperial

 

believing

 

naturally

 

belongs


possession

 

withheld

 

interest

 

national

 

wealth

 

compensation

 

obligation

 
penury
 

involved

 

nation


exclusively

 

events

 
circumstances
 
reciting
 

Colonial

 

Office

 
London
 

resulting

 
fairness
 

respectfully