FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124  
125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   >>   >|  
er, whose heiress John of Gant the king's son had married; and afterwards confirmed in parliament, to honour John of Gant himself; whom, on the death of his father-in-law, he had also created duke of Lancaster[g]. Counties palatine are so called _a palatio_; because the owners thereof, the earl of Chester, the bishop of Durham, and the duke of Lancaster, had in those counties _jura regalia_, as fully as the king hath in his palace; _regalem potestatem in omnibus_, as Bracton expresses it[h]. They might pardon treasons, murders, and felonies; they appointed all judges and justices of the peace; all writs and indictments ran in their names, as in other counties in the king's; and all offences were said to be done against their peace, and not, as in other places, _contra pacem domini regis_[i]. And indeed by the antient law, in all peculiar jurisdictions, offences were said to be done against his peace in whose court they were tried; in a court leet, _contra pacem domini_; in the court of a corporation, _contra pacem ballivorum_; in the sheriff's court or tourn, _contra pacem vice-comitis_[k]. These palatine privileges were in all probability originally granted to the counties of Chester and Durham, because they bordered upon enemies countries, Wales and Scotland; in order that the owners, being encouraged by so large an authority, might be the more watchful in it's defence; and that the inhabitants, having justice administered at home, might not be obliged to go out of the county, and leave it open to the enemies incursions. And upon this account also there were formerly two other counties palatine, Pembrokeshire and Hexamshire, the latter now united with Northumberland: but these were abolished by parliament, the former in 27 Hen. VIII, the latter in 14 Eliz. And in 27 Hen. VIII likewise, the powers beforementioned of owners of counties palatine were abridged; the reason for their continuance in a manner ceasing: though still all writs are witnessed in their names, and all forfeitures for treason by the common law accrue to them[l]. [Footnote f: Seld. tit. hon. 2. 5. 8.] [Footnote g: Plowd. 215.] [Footnote h: _l._ 3. _c._ 8. Sec. 4.] [Footnote i: 4. Inst. 204.] [Footnote k: Seld. _in Hengham magn._ _c._ 2.] [Footnote l: 4 Inst. 205.] OF these three, the county of Durham is now the only one remaining in the hands of a subject. For the earldom of Chester, as Camden testifies, was united to the crown by Henr
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124  
125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

counties

 

contra

 

palatine

 
Durham
 

owners

 

Chester

 

domini

 

parliament

 

county


Lancaster

 

united

 

offences

 
enemies
 
abridged
 
reason
 

beforementioned

 

abolished

 

Northumberland

 

Hexamshire


Pembrokeshire

 

account

 

likewise

 
powers
 

incursions

 

Hengham

 
remaining
 
testifies
 

Camden

 
subject

earldom
 

forfeitures

 
treason
 

common

 
witnessed
 

manner

 

ceasing

 
accrue
 

obliged

 

continuance


palace

 
regalem
 

potestatem

 

omnibus

 
regalia
 

Bracton

 

expresses

 

appointed

 
judges
 

justices