FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271  
272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   >>   >|  
position, and secured its passage by a test vote of seventy-eight to fifty-four. No other action of consequence then followed except a manifestation of interest in compensated emancipation in Missouri. At a cabinet meeting on the last day of December, 1862, Lincoln read the final draft of the Emancipation Proclamation and invited criticism. He made some revision of a minor nature but rejected the proposal to eliminate from the order the provision that the freedmen be armed. In this form the Proclamation was issued the following day, January 1, 1863. The constitutionality of this document has been questioned. It is conceded, however, that it did actually abolish slavery within the rebellious area and as a moral stimulus to the struggle for freedom, it proved to be of great value. HARRY S. BLACKISTON FOOTNOTES: [1] Edwards, _History of Illinois_, 179. [2] Nicolay and Hay, _Abraham Lincoln_, I, 72; W. H. Lamon, _Life of Abraham Lincoln_, 83. [3] Nicolay and Hay, _Abraham Lincoln_, I, 15, 140, 151, 642. [4] Nicolay and Hay, _Abraham Lincoln_, I, 148, 285-288. [5] Nicolay and Hay, _Abraham Lincoln_, I, 286. [6] _Ibid._, I, 373, 375, 380-390. [7] _Ibid._, I, pp. 391, 392. [8] Nicolay and Hay, II, 85, 89. [9] Nicolay and Hay, II, 136-138, 143. [10] Nicolay and Hay, II, 137, 156, 157; _Lincoln-Douglass Debates_, p. 8. [11] Nicolay and Hay, II, pp. 75, 147. [12] _Ibid._, II, p. 149. [13] Nicolay and Hay, II, 156, 157, 216. [14] Murat Halstead, _Conventions of 1860_, 6. [15] _Ibid._, 7. [16] Nicolay and Hay, II, 255. [17] Nicolay and Hay, II, 287, 382. [18] Rhodes, _United States_, III, p. 357. [19] Burgess, _Civil War_, II, p. 76. [20] Nicolay and Hay, _Abraham Lincoln_, IV, 416-420; V, p. 211. [21] Burgess, _Civil War_, II, 79-80. [22] Nicolay and Hay, V, 206. [23] Nicolay and Hay, V, 207. [24] Dodge, _View_, chap. xi. [25] Nicolay and Hay, V, p. 209. [26] McPherson, _History of the Rebellion_, p. 210. [27] Nicolay and Hay, V, 214. [28] _Ibid._, VI, p. 90. [29] Nicolay and Hay, VI, 94-96. [30] _Ibid._, VI, 97. [31] Nicolay and Hay, VI, 99-100. [32] Nicolay and Hay, VI, 103. [33] _Ibid._, VI, 107. [34] _Ibid._, VI, pp. 109-111. [35] King, _New Orleans_, ch. xiii. [36] Dodge, _View_, ch. x. [37] Nicolay and Hay, VI, p. 121. [38] _Ibid._, VI, pp. 123-124. [39] Warden, _Life of S. P. Chase_
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   259   260   261   262   263   264   265   266   267   268   269   270   271  
272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Nicolay

 

Lincoln

 
Abraham
 

Proclamation

 
History
 

Burgess

 

Rhodes

 
United
 

States

 

Douglass


Debates

 

Halstead

 

Conventions

 
Orleans
 

Warden

 

McPherson

 
Rebellion
 

criticism

 

invited

 

Emancipation


December
 

revision

 
freedmen
 
provision
 

nature

 
rejected
 

proposal

 

eliminate

 

meeting

 

seventy


secured

 

position

 

passage

 
action
 

emancipation

 

compensated

 

Missouri

 

cabinet

 

interest

 

manifestation


consequence

 

issued

 
Illinois
 

Edwards

 

BLACKISTON

 

FOOTNOTES

 

proved

 

freedom

 

questioned

 
conceded