FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367  
368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   >>   >|  
d "the Return of Christ". By the term Bab, the Bab meant to be the forerunner of the second manifestation rather than, as some have maintained, the gate of the Qa'im. When He declared Himself to be the Bab, the people understood by the term that He was an intermediary between the absent Qa'im and His followers, though He Himself never meant to be such a person. All He claimed to be was that He was the Qa'im Himself and in addition to this station, that of the Bab, namely the gate or forerunner of "Him Whom God will make manifest". There are many authorised traditions from Mu?ammad stating clearly (as explained in the Iqan) that the promised Qa'im would bring a new Book and new Laws. In other words abrogating the law of Islam. Shoghi Effendi feels that the Unity of the Baha'i revelation as one complete whole embracing the Faith of the Bab should be emphasised... The Faith of the Bab should not be divorced from that of Baha'u'llah. Though the teachings of the Bayan have been abrogated and superseded by the laws of Aqdas, yet due to the fact that the Bab considered Himself as the forerunner of Baha'u'llah we should regard His dispensation together with that of Baha'u'llah as forming one entity, the former being an introductory to the advent of the latter. Just as the advent of John the Baptist--who according to various authorities was Himself the originator of laws which abrogated the teachings current among the Jews--forms part of the Christian revelation, the advent of the Bab likewise forms an integral part of the Baha'i Faith. That is why Shoghi Effendi feels justified to call Nabil's narrative a narrative of the early days of the Baha'i revelation. Shoghi Effendi feels that it should be explained that forbidding self defence by Baha'u'llah should not be taken too literally. To put it as bluntly as this, he fears that the question might be misunderstood. Baha'u'llah could surely have not meant that a Baha'i should not attempt to defend his life against any irresponsible assailant who might attack him for any purpose whatever, whether religious or not. Every reasonable person would feel under such circumstances justified in protecting his life.... Regarding Nabil: He was born on the 18th day of the month of Safar of the year 1247 A. H. in the village of Zarand in Persia. He was thirteen years old when the Bab declared Himself. Though still young he himself was preparing to leave for _Sh_ay_kh_ Tabarsi and join th
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358   359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367  
368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   384   385   386   387   388   389   390   391   392   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Himself

 

Shoghi

 
Effendi
 

forerunner

 

revelation

 

advent

 
teachings
 
abrogated
 

Though

 

explained


narrative
 
declared
 
justified
 

person

 

likewise

 

Christian

 
misunderstood
 

integral

 

question

 

forbidding


literally

 

bluntly

 

defence

 

Persia

 

thirteen

 

Zarand

 

village

 

Tabarsi

 

preparing

 

purpose


current

 

attack

 

assailant

 

attempt

 

defend

 
irresponsible
 
religious
 

Regarding

 

protecting

 

reasonable


circumstances
 
surely
 

manifest

 

addition

 

station

 

stating

 
promised
 

authorised

 
traditions
 

claimed