FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225  
226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   >>   >|  
do is to become a passive spectator or a disregarded suppliant. ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Note 1. See the conduct of the Northern States in the war of 1812. "During that war," says Jefferson in a letter to General Lafayette, "four of the Eastern States were only attached to the Union, like so many inanimate bodies to living men." ------------------------------------------------------------------------ Note 2. The profound peace of the Union affords no pretext for a standing army; and without a standing army a Government is not prepared to profit by a favourable opportunity to conquer resistance, and take the sovereign power by surprise. VOLUME TWO, CHAPTER EIGHT. The next question to be examined into is, has this government of the United States set an example of honour, good faith, and moral principle, to those who are subjected to it?--has it, by so behaving, acted favourably upon the morals of the people, and corrected the vices and errors of the monarchical institutions which the Americans hold up to such detestation? The Americans may be said to have had, till within the last twenty years, little or no relation with other countries. They have had few treaties to make, and very little diplomatic arrangements with the old Continent. But even if they had had, they must not be judged by them; a certain degree of national honour is necessary to every nation, if they would have the respect of others, and a dread of the consequences would always compel them to adhere to any treaty made with great and powerful countries. The question is, has the Federal Government adhered to its treaties and promises made with and to those who have been too weak to defend themselves? Has it not repeatedly, in the short period of their existence as a nation, violated the national honour whenever without being in fear of retaliation or exposure it has been able to do so. Let this question be answered by an examination into their conduct towards the unhappy Indians, _who_, to use their own expression, are "now melting away like snow before the white men." We are not to estimate the morality of a government by its strict adherence to its compacts with the powerful, but by its strict moral sense of justice towards the weak and defenceless; and it should be borne in mind, that one example of a breach of faith on the part of a democratic government, is more injurious to the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225  
226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

question

 

government

 
honour
 

States

 

Government

 
standing
 

powerful

 
Americans
 
conduct
 

nation


strict
 

countries

 

national

 

treaties

 

degree

 

judged

 

defend

 

promises

 

consequences

 
treaty

compel
 

respect

 

adhere

 
adhered
 
Federal
 

adherence

 

compacts

 
morality
 

estimate

 

justice


defenceless
 

democratic

 

injurious

 
breach
 

melting

 

retaliation

 

violated

 

repeatedly

 

period

 
existence

exposure

 
expression
 

Indians

 
unhappy
 
answered
 

examination

 
affords
 

pretext

 

profound

 
inanimate