FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358  
359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   >>   >|  
South. Q. Is there not a deep-seated feeling of disappointment and chagrin at the result of the war? A. I think that at the time they were disappointed at the result of the war. Q. Do you mean to be understood as saying that there is not a condition of discontent against the Government of the United States among the secessionists generally? A. I know none. Q. Are you prepared to say that they respect the Government of the United States, and the loyal people of the United States, so much at the present time as to perform their duties as citizens of the United States, and of the States, faithfully and well? A. I believe that they will perform all the duties that they are required to perform; I think that is the general feeling so far as I know. Q. Do you think it would be practicable to convict a man in Virginia of treason for having taken part in this rebellion against the Government by a Virginian jury without packing it with direct reference to a verdict of guilty? A. On that point I have no knowledge, and I do not know what they would consider treason against the United States--if you refer to past acts. Mr. Howard: Yes, sir. Witness: I have no knowledge what their views on that subject in the past are. Q. You understand my question. Suppose a jury was impanelled in your own neighborhood, taken by lot, would it be possible to convict, for instance, Jefferson Davis, for having levied war upon the United States, and thus having committed the crime of treason? A. I think it is very probable that they would not consider he had committed treason. THEIR VIEWS OF TREASON. Q. Suppose the jury should be clearly and plainly instructed by the Court that such an act of war upon the part of Mr. Davis or any other leading man constituted the crime of treason under the Constitution of the United States, would the jury be likely to heed that instruction, and, if the facts were plainly in proof before them, convict the offender? A. I do not know, sir, what they would do on that question. Q. They do not generally suppose that it was treason against the United States, do they? A. I do not think that they so consider it. Q. In what light would they view it? What would be their excuse or justification? How would they escape, in their own mind? I refer to the past--I am referring to the past and the feelings they would have? A. So far as I know, they look upon the action of the State in wi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   334   335   336   337   338   339   340   341   342   343   344   345   346   347   348   349   350   351   352   353   354   355   356   357   358  
359   360   361   362   363   364   365   366   367   368   369   370   371   372   373   374   375   376   377   378   379   380   381   382   383   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

United

 

treason

 
perform
 

convict

 
Government
 

knowledge

 
duties
 

committed

 
result

plainly

 
feeling
 
Suppose
 
generally
 

question

 
instructed
 

levied

 

Jefferson

 

instance

 
probable

TREASON

 

justification

 
escape
 

excuse

 

action

 

referring

 

feelings

 

suppose

 

leading

 

constituted


Constitution

 

offender

 

instruction

 
verdict
 

people

 

respect

 
prepared
 

present

 
faithfully
 

citizens


secessionists

 
disappointment
 

chagrin

 
seated
 

disappointed

 

discontent

 
condition
 

understood

 

required

 

Witness