South.
Q. Is there not a deep-seated feeling of disappointment and chagrin at
the result of the war?
A. I think that at the time they were disappointed at the result of
the war.
Q. Do you mean to be understood as saying that there is not a
condition of discontent against the Government of the United States
among the secessionists generally?
A. I know none.
Q. Are you prepared to say that they respect the Government of the
United States, and the loyal people of the United States, so much at
the present time as to perform their duties as citizens of the United
States, and of the States, faithfully and well?
A. I believe that they will perform all the duties that they are
required to perform; I think that is the general feeling so far as I
know.
Q. Do you think it would be practicable to convict a man in Virginia
of treason for having taken part in this rebellion against the
Government by a Virginian jury without packing it with direct
reference to a verdict of guilty?
A. On that point I have no knowledge, and I do not know what they
would consider treason against the United States--if you refer to past
acts.
Mr. Howard: Yes, sir.
Witness: I have no knowledge what their views on that subject in the
past are.
Q. You understand my question. Suppose a jury was impanelled in your
own neighborhood, taken by lot, would it be possible to convict, for
instance, Jefferson Davis, for having levied war upon the United
States, and thus having committed the crime of treason?
A. I think it is very probable that they would not consider he had
committed treason.
THEIR VIEWS OF TREASON.
Q. Suppose the jury should be clearly and plainly instructed by the
Court that such an act of war upon the part of Mr. Davis or any other
leading man constituted the crime of treason under the Constitution of
the United States, would the jury be likely to heed that instruction,
and, if the facts were plainly in proof before them, convict the
offender?
A. I do not know, sir, what they would do on that question.
Q. They do not generally suppose that it was treason against the
United States, do they?
A. I do not think that they so consider it.
Q. In what light would they view it? What would be their excuse or
justification? How would they escape, in their own mind? I refer to
the past--I am referring to the past and the feelings they would have?
A. So far as I know, they look upon the action of the State in
wi
|