FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301  
302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   >>   >|  
for the sake of your own question, do you think it wise to pick my apples now? Please answer me in the frankness of personal friendship. With kind regards, I am very truly yours, JAMES A. GARFIELD. Miss SUSAN B. ANTHONY, Rochester, N. Y. ROCHESTER, N. Y., September 9, 1880. Hon. JAMES A. GARFIELD: _Dear Sir_: Yours of the 25th ult. has waited all these days that I might consider and carefully reply. _First_. The Republican party did run well for a season in the "line of liberty"; but since 1870, its congressional enactments, majority reports, Supreme Court decisions, and now its presidential platform, show a retrograde movement--not only for women, but for colored men--limiting the power of the national government in the protection of United States citizens against the injustice of the States, until what we gained by the sword is lost by political surrenders. And we need nothing but a Democratic administration to demonstrate to all Israel and the sun the fact, the sad fact, that all _is lost_ by the _Republican_ party, and not _to be lost_ by the _Democratic_ party. I mean, of course, the one vital point of national supremacy in the protection of United States citizens in the enjoyment of their right to vote, and the punishment of States or individuals thereof, for depriving citizens of the exercise of that right. The first and fatal mistake was in ceding to the States the right to "abridge or deny" the suffrage to foreign-born men in Rhode Island, and all women throughout the nation, in direct violation of the principle of national supremacy. And from that time, inch by inch, point by point has been surrendered, until it is only in _name_ that the Republican party is the party of national supremacy. Grant did not protect the negro's ballot in 1876--Hayes cannot in 1880--nor could Garfield in 1884--for the "sceptre has departed from Judah." _Second_. For the candidate of a party to _add_ to the discussions of the contest an issue unauthorized or unnoted in its platform, when that issue was one vital to its very life, would, it seems to me, be the grandest act imaginable. And, for doing that very thing, with regard to the protection of the negro
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295   296   297   298   299   300   301  
302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

States

 

national

 

supremacy

 

Republican

 

citizens

 
protection
 

United

 

GARFIELD

 

platform

 
Democratic

Island

 

foreign

 
suffrage
 

depriving

 

enjoyment

 

question

 

punishment

 

mistake

 

ceding

 
exercise

individuals

 

thereof

 

nation

 

abridge

 

surrendered

 

unauthorized

 

unnoted

 
contest
 

discussions

 

candidate


regard

 

imaginable

 

grandest

 

Second

 
protect
 

violation

 

principle

 

ballot

 
sceptre
 
departed

Garfield

 

direct

 

surrenders

 

personal

 

carefully

 

friendship

 

liberty

 
Please
 

season

 

answer