FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652  
653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   >>   >|  
ntract of marriage, its obligations, duties, responsibilities, and the very basis on which it rests. The rules of the common law on this subject have been dispelled, routed, and justly so, by the acts of 1860 and 1862. They are things of the past which have succumbed to more liberal and just views, like many other doctrines of the common law which could not stand the scrutiny and analysis of modern civilization. The utter insecurity of woman without the ballot is shown in the reversal of this decision within a few months, by the Court of Appeals, on the ground that it would be "contrary to the policy of the law, and destructive to the conjugal union and tranquility which it had always been the object of the law to guard and protect." Could satire go farther? We record with satisfaction the fact that Judge Danforth uttered a strong dissenting opinion. The friends of woman suffrage in the legislature of 1884 secured the passage of a bill empowering women to vote on all questions of taxation submitted to a popular vote in the village of Union Springs. Governor Cleveland was urged to veto it; but after hearing all the objections he signed the bill and it became a law. At Clinton, Oneida county, twenty-two women voted on June 21, 1884, at an election on the question of establishing water-works. Eight voted for the tax, fourteen against it. Fifteen other women appeared at the polls, but were excluded from voting because, though they were real-estate tax-payers, the assessor had left their names off the tax-roll. Judge Theodore W. Dwight, president of the Columbia Law School, pronounced women tax-payers entitled to vote under the general water-works act, and therefore that the election-officials violated the law in refusing to accept the votes of the women whose names were omitted from the assessors' tax-list. In 1879, there was a report of the committee to allow widows an active voice in the settlement of the family estate and to have the sole guardianship of minor children. A petition in favor of the bill had upon it the names of such well-known men as Peter Cooper, George William Curtis, Henry Bergh and J. W. Simonton. September 13, 1879, Mrs. MacDonald of Boston argued her own case before the United States Circuit Court in New York city, in a patent suit. It was a marked event in court circles, she being the first lady pleader that ever appeared in that court, and the second w
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   628   629   630   631   632   633   634   635   636   637   638   639   640   641   642   643   644   645   646   647   648   649   650   651   652  
653   654   655   656   657   658   659   660   661   662   663   664   665   666   667   668   669   670   671   672   673   674   675   676   677   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

payers

 

estate

 

election

 

common

 

appeared

 

entitled

 
general
 

pronounced

 
omitted
 

assessors


accept

 
officials
 
violated
 
refusing
 

assessor

 
excluded
 

voting

 
Fifteen
 

fourteen

 

Dwight


president
 

Columbia

 

Theodore

 

School

 

United

 

States

 

Circuit

 

MacDonald

 
Boston
 

argued


patent

 

pleader

 

marked

 

circles

 

September

 

Simonton

 

guardianship

 

children

 
petition
 
family

settlement
 

committee

 
report
 
widows
 

active

 
William
 

George

 

Curtis

 

Cooper

 
modern