FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43  
44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   >>   >|  
not of the matter touching Arabella. I would not charge you, sir Walter, with the matter of falsehood: you say you suspected the Intelligence that Cobham had with Aremberg by Lawrency. RALEIGH--I thought it had been no other intelligence, but such as might be warranted. ATTORNEY--Then it was but lawful suspicion. But to that whereas you said, that Cobham had accused you in passion, I answer three ways. 1. I observed, when Cobham said let me see the letter again, he paused; and when he did see that count Aremberg was touched, he cried out, oh traitor! oh villain! now will I confess the whole truth. 2. The accusation of a man on hearsay is nothing: would he accuse himself on passion and ruinate his case and posterity out of malice to accuse you? 3. Could this be out of passion? Mark the manner of it; Cobham had told this at least two months before to his brother Brook, 'You are fools, you are on the Bye, Raleigh and I are on the Main, we mean to take away the king and his cubs.' This he delivered two months before. So mark the manner and the matter; he would not turn the weapon against his own bosom, and accuse himself to accuse you. RALEIGH--Hath Cobham confessed that? LORD CHIEF-JUSTICE--This is spoken by Mr. Attorney to prove that Cobham's speech came not out of passion. RALEIGH--Let it be proved that Cobham said so. ATTORNEY--Cobham saith that he was a long time doubtful of Raleigh that he would send him and the money to the king. Did Cobham fear lest you would betray him in Jersey? Then of necessity there must be trust between you. No man can betray a man but he that is trusted, in my understanding. That is the greatest argument to prove that he was acquainted with Cobham's proceedings. Raleigh has a deeper reach, than to make himself as he said, 'Robin Hood, a Kett, or Cade'; yet I never heard that Robin Hood was a traitor; they say he was an outlaw. And whereas he saith that our king is not only more wealthy and potent than his predecessors, but also more politic and wise, so that he could have no hope to prevail; I answer, There is no king so potent, wise, and active, but he may be overtaken through treason. Whereas you say Spain is so poor, discoursing so largely thereof; it had been better for you to have kept in Guiana, than to have been so wel
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43  
44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Cobham

 

passion

 

accuse

 

Raleigh

 

RALEIGH

 
matter
 

Aremberg

 

potent

 

betray

 

traitor


manner
 

months

 

ATTORNEY

 

answer

 

trusted

 

understanding

 

proceedings

 
argument
 

acquainted

 

greatest


Jersey

 

doubtful

 

Arabella

 

proved

 

necessity

 

overtaken

 
treason
 
Whereas
 

active

 
prevail

Guiana

 

discoursing

 

largely

 
thereof
 

politic

 

speech

 

touching

 

wealthy

 
predecessors
 

outlaw


deeper

 

confess

 

villain

 

touched

 

hearsay

 

falsehood

 
suspected
 
Intelligence
 

accusation

 

Lawrency