FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   >>  
earted pastime it offers little but opportunities for misunderstanding, general conversation, allegations of unfairness, and disappointment. "Suggestions" ought to be played like this: You sit in a semicircle and the first player says something--anything--a single word. Let us suppose it is (as it probably will be in thousands of cases) "MARGOT." The next player has to say what "MARGOT" suggests--"reticence," for example--and the next player, shutting his mind completely to the word "MARGOT," has to say what "reticence" suggests--perhaps _Grimaud_, in _The Three Musketeers_--and the fourth player has to disregard "reticence" and announce whatever mental reaction the name of _Grimaud_ produces. It maybe that he has never heard of _Grimaud_ and the similarity of sound suggests only GRIMALDI the clown. Then he ought to say, "GRIMALDI the clown," which might in its turn suggest "melancholy" or "the circus." All the time no one should speak but the players in their turn, and they should speak instantly and should say nothing but the thing that is honestly suggested by the previous word. At the end of, say, a dozen rounds the process of unwinding the coil begins, each player in rotation taking part in the backward process until "MARGOT" is again reached. That is how the game should be played. This is how it _is_ played:-- _First Player._ Let me see; what shall I say? _Various other Players_ (_together_). Surely there's no difficulty in beginning? Say "anything," etc., etc. _A Player_ (_looking round_). Say--say "fireplace." _First Player._ But that's so silly. _Master of Ceremonies_ (_who wishes he had never proposed the game_). It doesn't matter. All that is needed is a start. _Another player._ Say "MARGOT." (_Roars of laughter._) _All._ Oh, yes, say "MARGOT." _First Player._ Very well, then--"MARGOT." (_More laughter._) _Second Player_ (_trying to be clever_). "Reticence." (_Shouts of laughter._) _Other Players._ How could "MARGOT" suggest "reticence"? _M. C._ Never mind; the point is that it did. Now then--and please everyone be silent--now, then, Third Player? _Third Player._ "Audacity." _M. C._ I'm afraid you're not playing quite fairly. You see "reticence" cannot suggest "audacity." The First Player's word not impossibly might. Could it be that you were still thinking of that? _Third Player._ I'm sorry. But "reticence" doesn't suggest anything. _Other Players_ (_together_
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   >>  



Top keywords:

Player

 

MARGOT

 

reticence

 

player

 
suggest
 

Grimaud

 

suggests

 

laughter

 

played

 

Players


GRIMALDI

 

process

 

proposed

 
wishes
 
Various
 
Ceremonies
 

fireplace

 

beginning

 

difficulty

 

Surely


Master

 

Reticence

 

afraid

 
playing
 

Audacity

 

silent

 
fairly
 
thinking
 

audacity

 
impossibly

needed
 

Another

 
Second
 

Shouts

 
clever
 

matter

 

thousands

 
shutting
 

suppose

 

completely


announce

 
mental
 

disregard

 

fourth

 
Musketeers
 

single

 

misunderstanding

 

general

 
conversation
 

opportunities