FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509  
510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   >>   >|  
h--in the eyes of a large part of Christendom--more than neutralized the soundness of its original conception.[331] In England, where from the ninth century, marriage was generally accepted by the ecclesiastical and temporal powers as indissoluble, Canon law was, in the main, established as in the rest of Christendom. There were, however, certain points in which Canon law was not accepted by the law of England. By English law a ceremony before a priest was necessary to the validity of a marriage, though in Scotland the Canon law doctrine was accepted that simple consent of the parties, even exchanged secretly, sufficed to constitute marriage. Again, the issue of a void marriage contracted in innocence, and the issue of persons who subsequently marry each other, are legitimate by Canon law, but not by the common law of England (Geary, _Marriage and Family Relations_, p. 3; Pollock and Maitland, loc. cit.). The Canonists regarded the disabilities attaching to bastardy as a punishment inflicted on the offending parents, and considered, therefore, that no burden should fall on the children when there had been a ceremony in good faith on the part of one at least of the parents. In this respect the English law is less reasonable and humane. It was at the Council of Merton, in 1236, that the barons of England rejected the proposal to make the laws of England harmonize with the Canon law, that is, with the ecclesiastical law of Christendom generally, in allowing children born before wedlock to be legitimated by subsequent marriage. Grosseteste poured forth his eloquence and his arguments in favor of the change, but in vain, and the law of England has ever since stood alone in this respect (Freeman, "Merton Priory," _English Towns and Districts_). The proposal was rejected in the famous formula, "Nolumus leges Angliae mutare," a formula which merely stood for an unreasonable and inhumane obstinacy. In the United States, while by common law subsequent marriage fails to legitimate children born before marriage, in many of the States the subsequent marriage of the parents effects by statute the legitimacy of the child, sometimes (as in Maine) automatically, more usually (as in Massachusetts) through special acknowledgment by the father. The appearance of Luther and the Reformation involve
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   485   486   487   488   489   490   491   492   493   494   495   496   497   498   499   500   501   502   503   504   505   506   507   508   509  
510   511   512   513   514   515   516   517   518   519   520   521   522   523   524   525   526   527   528   529   530   531   532   533   534   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

marriage

 

England

 

accepted

 

Christendom

 

subsequent

 

parents

 
English
 

children

 
ceremony
 

respect


common

 
legitimate
 
States
 
formula
 

ecclesiastical

 
generally
 

proposal

 
Merton
 

rejected

 

Council


Grosseteste
 

arguments

 

eloquence

 

humane

 

poured

 

barons

 

harmonize

 

reasonable

 
change
 

wedlock


allowing

 

legitimated

 

automatically

 

legitimacy

 

statute

 

effects

 

Massachusetts

 

Luther

 
Reformation
 
involve

appearance
 

father

 
special
 
acknowledgment
 

United

 
Priory
 

Districts

 

famous

 

Freeman

 
Nolumus