FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   >>  
Iowa is to come in without dismemberment, then let Florida enter in like manner; but if Iowa is divided, then let Florida be divided also." Mr. Vinton, of Ohio, was the most vigorous champion of the Duncan amendment. He stood out firmly for a reduction of the boundaries proposed by the Iowa Convention because the country to the North and West of the new State, "from which two other States ought to be formed," would be left in a very inconvenient shape, and because the formation of such large States would deprive the West of "its due share of power in the Senate of the United States." Mr. Vinton was "particularly anxious that a State of unsuitable extent should not be made in that part of the Western country, in consequence of the unwise and mistaken policy towards that section of the Union which has hitherto prevailed in forming Western States, by which the great valley of the Mississippi has been deprived, and irrevocably so, of its due share in the legislation of the country." As an equitable compensation to the West for this injustice he would make "a series of small States" on the West bank of the Mississippi. Furthermore, Mr. Vinton did not think it politic to curtail the power of the West in the Senate of the United States by the establishment of large States, since in his opinion "the power of controlling this government in all its departments may be more safely intrusted to the West than in any other hands." The commercial interests of the people of the West were such as to make them desirous of protecting the capital and labor both of the North and the South. Again, he declared that if disunion should ever be attempted "the West must and will rally to a man under the flag of the Union." "To preserve this Union, to make its existence immortal, is the high destiny assigned by Providence itself to this great central power." The arguments for restriction prevailed, and the Duncan amendment, which proposed to substitute the _Nicollet boundaries_ for the _Lucas boundaries_, passed the House of Representatives by a vote of ninety-one to forty. In the Senate the bill as reported from the House was hurried through without much debate. Here the question of boundaries seems to have received no consideration whatever. There were, however, strong objections in some quarters to coupling Iowa with Florida in the matter of admission. Senator Choate, of Massachusetts, called attention to the fact that this was t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   >>  



Top keywords:
States
 

boundaries

 

Senate

 

Florida

 

Vinton

 

country

 
prevailed
 

Mississippi

 

United

 

Western


amendment

 

Duncan

 

divided

 

proposed

 
preserve
 

existence

 

central

 

arguments

 

Providence

 

assigned


destiny
 

immortal

 

attempted

 
desirous
 
protecting
 

capital

 

commercial

 

interests

 

people

 

restriction


disunion

 

declared

 

Massachusetts

 

objections

 

strong

 

quarters

 

hurried

 
coupling
 

debate

 

consideration


received

 

question

 
reported
 
Choate
 

passed

 

Representatives

 
substitute
 

called

 
Nicollet
 

ninety