FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  
Scott, were negro slaves, the lawful property of the defendant." Whereupon the court gave judgment for the defendant. After an ineffectual motion for a new trial, the plaintiff filed the following bill of exceptions. On the trial of this cause by the jury, the plaintiff, to maintain the issues on his part, read to the jury the following agreed statement of facts, (see agreement above.) No further testimony was given to the jury by either party. Thereupon the plaintiff moved the court to give to the jury the following instruction, viz.: "That upon the facts agreed to by the parties, they ought to find for the plaintiff. The court refused to give such instruction to the jury, and the plaintiff, to such refusal, then and there duly excepted." The court then gave the following instruction to the jury, on motion of the defendant: "The jury are instructed, that upon the facts in this case, the law is with the defendant." The plaintiff excepted to this instruction. Upon these exceptions, the case came up to this court. It was argued at December term, 1855, and ordered to be reargued at the present term. The opinion of the court, as delivered by Chief Justice Taney, being so lengthy, we omit all but the summing up, to wit: Upon the whole, therefore, it is the judgment of this court, that it appears by the record before us, that the plaintiff in error is not a citizen of Missouri, in the sense in which that word is used in the Constitution; and that the Circuit Court of the United States, for that reason, had no jurisdiction in the case, and could give no judgment in it. Its judgment for the defendant must, consequently, be reversed, and a mandate issued, directing the suit to be dismissed for want of jurisdiction. PRESIDENTS AND VICE-PRESIDENTS OF THE UNITED STATES. WITH THE VOTE FOR EACH CANDIDATE FOR OFFICE. BEFORE THE REVOLUTION. FIRST CONGRESS, Sept. 5, 1774. Peyton Randolph, of Virginia, President. Born in Virginia, in 1723, died at Philadelphia, Oct. 22, 1785. Charles Thomson, of Pennsylvania, Secretary. Born in Ireland, 1730, died in Pennsylvania, Aug. 16, 1824. SECOND CONGRESS, May 10, 1775. Peyton Randolph, President. Resigned May 24, 1775. John Hancock, of Massachusetts, elected his successor. He was born at Quincy, Mass., 1737, died Oct. 8, 1793. He was President of Congress until October, 1777. Henry Laurens, of South Carolina, President from Nov. 1, 1777, to Dec. 177
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

plaintiff

 

defendant

 

instruction

 
judgment
 
President
 

Virginia

 

excepted

 

Randolph

 
Pennsylvania
 

agreed


exceptions
 

CONGRESS

 

Peyton

 

motion

 

PRESIDENTS

 

jurisdiction

 

mandate

 

reversed

 
issued
 

directing


reason

 

dismissed

 

CANDIDATE

 

OFFICE

 

BEFORE

 

REVOLUTION

 

UNITED

 

STATES

 

Secretary

 

Congress


Quincy

 

October

 
Laurens
 

Carolina

 

successor

 

elected

 

States

 
Ireland
 
Thomson
 

Charles


Philadelphia

 
Hancock
 

Massachusetts

 

Resigned

 
SECOND
 
Thereupon
 

testimony

 

refusal

 

refused

 

parties