friendship for these classes has gone to the point of risking the
existence of their organization. Surely their presence is a guarantee
that Socialists have not been ruled by the working class or proletarian
"fetish," against which Marx warned them more than half a century ago.
FOOTNOTES:
[207] The _American Magazine_, October, 1911.
[208] Winston Churchill, _op. cit._, p. 389.
[209] _Die Neue Zeit_, Oct. 27, 1911.
[210] Speech just before Congressional Elections of 1910.
[211] Speech delivered by Mr. Roosevelt, Dec. 13, 1910.
[212] John Spargo, "Karl Marx."
[213] Edward Bernstein, "Evolutionary Socialism," p. 143.
[214] Karl Kautsky, "The Social Revolution," pp. 58-59.
[215] The _Outlook_, March 13, 1909.
[216] Karl Kautsky in _Vorwaerts_ (Berlin), Feb. 7, 1909.
[217] Quoted by Jaures, "Studies in Socialism," p. 103.
[218] Karl Kautsky, "Erfurter Programm," p. 258.
[219] Karl Kautsky, "The Social Revolution," pp. 48-49.
[220] The _International Socialist Review_ (Chicago), October, 1911.
[221] H. G. Wells, "This Misery of Boots," p. 34.
[222] Karl Kautsky, "The Social Revolution," p. 51.
CHAPTER II
THE AGRICULTURAL CLASSES AND THE LAND QUESTION
I have pointed out the relation of the Socialist movement to all classes
but one,--the agriculturists,--a class numerically next in importance to
the industrial wage earners.
On the one hand most agriculturists are small capitalists, who, even
when they do not own their farms, are often forced to-day to invest a
considerable sum in farm animals and machinery, in rent and interest and
in wages at the harvest season; on the other hand, a large part of the
farmers work harder and receive less for their work than skilled
laborers, while the amount they own, especially when tenants, scarcely
exceeds what it has cost many skilled workers to learn their trade. Are
the great majority of farmers, then, rather small capitalists or
laborers?
For many years Socialists paid comparatively little attention to the
problem. How was it then imagined that a political program could obtain
the support of the majority of the voters without presenting to the
agricultural population as satisfactory a solution of their difficulties
as that it offered to the people of the towns? On the other hand, how
was it possible to adapt a program frankly "formulated by or for the
workingmen of large-scale industry" to the conditions of agriculture?
The es
|