FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248  
249   250   251   252   253   254   >>  
which his force shall have the advantage. The advantage having been gained and recognized (or an advantage existing and being recognized), strategy insists on forcing a battle, for the reason that _every contest weakens the loser more than it does the winner_. This does not mean that it is always wise to engage a weaker force that is temporarily separated from its main body. It is readily understandable, for instance, that it would be unwise in two cases: 1. A case in which the weaker force were so little weaker, and were part of a force so much larger than the total of the smaller force, that the gain as between the two forces actually engaged would not be great enough to compensate for the loss entailed. For instance, a reference to Table I shows that an _A_ force of 1,000 engaging a _B_ force of 800 would have 569 left when _B_ was reduced to zero. This is impressive: but if the _B_ force of 800 were part of a total _B_ force of 2,000, in other words if there were an _A_ force of 1,200 near at hand, _B_ would have 569 left with which to oppose 1,200, a proportion a little less advantageous than the proportion he started with--1,000 to 2,000. 2. A case by which the _B_ force may have divided with the express purpose of luring _A_ to attack; arrangements having been made whereby the inferior _B_ force would simply hold the _A_ force until the whole _B_ force could come to its assistance; arrangements having been also made that this would be accomplished before the detached part of _B_ should get very badly damaged. Attention is invited to Table III, which is a continuation of Table I. It represents what would happen if a force of 1,000 should fight separately two forces, one of 800 and the other of 200. In column 1, _A_ is supposed to have engaged the 200 first, and so to have become reduced to 970, and to engage 800 afterward. In column 2, _A_ is supposed to have engaged 800 first, thereby becoming reduced to 569, and then to engage the 200 force. The table indicates that it makes no difference whether _A_ engages the stronger or the weaker force first. Column 3 shows that a force of 841, the part remaining after a force of 1,000 had annihilated a force of 500, would have 653 left after annihilating a second force of 500. Taken in connection with columns 1 and 2, this indicates that it is easier to defeat two separated _equal_ forces than two separated _unequal_ forces of the same aggregate value; that the
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233   234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248  
249   250   251   252   253   254   >>  



Top keywords:

forces

 

weaker

 

engaged

 

reduced

 
separated
 
advantage
 

engage

 

instance

 

proportion

 

arrangements


recognized

 
column
 

supposed

 

represents

 
continuation
 

assistance

 
simply
 
accomplished
 
damaged
 

Attention


invited

 

detached

 
annihilated
 

annihilating

 

remaining

 
Column
 

unequal

 

defeat

 
easier
 
connection

columns
 

stronger

 
engages
 
afterward
 

separately

 

difference

 

aggregate

 

inferior

 
happen
 

temporarily


readily

 
understandable
 

smaller

 

larger

 

unwise

 

winner

 

strategy

 

insists

 

existing

 

gained