FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198  
199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   >>  
. It may not be entirely superfluous to recount the history of a verse which has justly attracted so much attention, and which, in the history of civilization, has been of more value than the whole State of South Carolina. From its first application to Franklin, this verse has excited something more than curiosity. Lord Brougham tells us that it is often discussed in private circles. There is other evidence of the interest it has created. For instance, in an early number of "Notes and Queries"[7] there is the following inquiry:-- "Can you tell me who wrote the line on Franklin, '_Eripuit_,'etc.? "HENRY H. BREEN. "_St. Lucia_." A subsequent writer in this same work, after calling the verse "a parody" of a certain line of antiquity, says,--"I am unable to say who adapted these words to Franklin's career. Was it Condorcet?"[8] Another writer in the same work says,--"The inscription was written by Mirabeau."[9] I remember well a social entertainment in Boston, where a most distinguished scholar of our country, in reply to an inquiry made at the table, said that the verse was founded on the following line from the "Astronomicon"[10] of Manilius,-- "Eripuit Jovi fulmen, viresque tonandi." John Quincy Adams, who was present, seemed to concur. Mr. Sparks, in his notes to the correspondence of Franklin, attributes it to the same origin.[11] But there are other places where its origin is traced with more precision. One of the correspondents of "Notes and Queries" says that he has read, but does not remember where, "that this line was _immediately_ taken from one in the 'Anti-Lucretius' of Cardinal Polignac."[12] Another correspondent shows the intermediate authority.[13] My own notes were originally made without any knowledge of these studies, which, while fixing its literary origin, fail to exhibit the true character of the verse, both in its meaning and in the time when it was uttered. The verse cannot be found in any ancient writer,--not Claudian or anybody else. It is clear that it does not come from antiquity, unless indirectly; nor does it appear that at the time of its first production it was in any way referred to any ancient writer. Manilius was not mentioned. The verse is of modern invention, and was composed after the arrival of Franklin in Paris on his eventful mission. At first it was anonymous; but it was attributed sometimes to D'Alembert and sometimes to Turgot. Beyond question
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191   192   193   194   195   196   197   198  
199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   >>  



Top keywords:

Franklin

 

writer

 

origin

 

ancient

 
Queries
 
inquiry
 

Eripuit

 

Another

 

antiquity

 

Manilius


remember

 
history
 

intermediate

 

correspondent

 
Lucretius
 

Cardinal

 
Polignac
 
authority
 
knowledge
 

studies


originally

 

superfluous

 
attributes
 

correspondence

 

justly

 
Sparks
 

attracted

 

places

 
traced
 
recount

immediately
 

correspondents

 
precision
 
literary
 

modern

 

invention

 

composed

 

arrival

 
mentioned
 

referred


production

 
eventful
 

Alembert

 

Turgot

 

Beyond

 

question

 

attributed

 

mission

 

anonymous

 

indirectly