been misinformed as to Sawyer's speech.]

[Footnote 645: Lords' and Commons' Journals, Jan. 29. 1688/9]

[Footnote 646: Clarendon's Diary, Jan. 21. 1688/9; Burnet, i. 810;
Doyly's Life of Sancroft;]

[Footnote 647: See the Act of Uniformity.]

[Footnote 648: Stat. 2 Hen. 7. c. I.: Lord Coke's Institutes, part iii.
chap i.; Trial of Cook for high treason, in the Collection of State
Trials; Burnet, i. 873. and Swift's note.]

[Footnote 649: Lords Journals Jan. 29. 1688/9; Clarendon's Diary;
Evelyn's Diary; Citters; Eachard's History of the Revolution; Barnet,
i. 813.; History of the Reestablishment of the Government, 1689. The
numbers of the Contents and Not Contents are not given in the journals,
and are differently reported by different writers. I have followed
Clarendon, who took the trouble to make out lists of the majority and
minority.]

[Footnote 650: Grey's Debates; Evelyn's Diary; Life of Archbishop Sharp,
by his son; Apology for the New Separation, in a letter to Dr. John
Sharp, Archbishop of York, 1691.]

[Footnote 651: Lords' Journals, Jan. 30. 1689/8; Clarendon's Diary.]

[Footnote 652: Dartmouth's note on Burnet i. 393. Dartmouth says that it
was from Fagel that the Lords extracted the hint. This was a slip of the
pen very pardonable in a hasty marginal note; but Dalrymple and others
ought not to have copied so palpable a blunder. Fagel died in Holland,
on the 5th of December 1688, when William was at Salisbury and James
at Whitehall. The real person was, I suppose, Dykvelt, Bentinck, or
Zulestein, most probably Dykvelt.]

[Footnote 653: Both the service and Burnet's sermon are still to be
found in our great libraries, and will repay the trouble of perusal.]

[Footnote 654: Lords' Journals, Jan. 31. 1688/9.]

[Footnote 655: Citters, Feb. 5/15. 1689; Clarendon's Diary, Feb. 2. The
story is greatly exaggerated in the work entitled Revolution Politics,
an eminently absurd book, yet of some value as a record of the foolish
reports of the day. Greys Debates.]

[Footnote 656: The letter of James, dated Jan 24/Feb 3 1689, will be
found in Kennet. It is most disingenuously garbled in Clarke's Life
of James. See Clarendon's Diary, Feb. 2. 4.; Grey's Debates; Lords'
Journals, Feb. 2. 4. 1688/9.]

[Footnote 657: It has been asserted by several writers, and, among
others, by Ralph and by M. Mazure, that Danby signed this protest. This
is a mistake. Probably some person who examined the journals before the