FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139  
140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   >>   >|  
"appeal" covers (1) a removal of a cause to a higher court for retrial on all the questions of law or fact involved, or (2) taking up points of law only by proceedings in error, for revision by a higher court. Decrees in admiralty, bankruptcy and equity, in the federal courts, are the subjects of an appeal; judgments in actions at law, of a writ of error. On an equity appeal the evidence taken at the original hearing is reported at length to the appellate court, and it has the right to review the conclusions of fact reached by the court below and come to different ones. This, however, is seldom done, the appeal being almost always decided on points of law based upon the conclusions of fact reached in the original hearing. In admiralty appeals the conclusions of fact reached by the trial court are specially set forth, and are final. "Appeal" in many of the states is the general term for reviewing any judgment of an inferior court on assignments of error. It is also often used to signify a mode of reviewing proceedings of municipal bodies, affecting the interests of particular persons, e.g. in matters of licences or assessments. In criminal prosecutions an appeal, or writ of error on points of law, is almost everywhere allowed by statute to the defendant, and often to the state. (_United States_ v. _Sanges_, 144 United States Reports, 310; _State_ v. _Lee_, 65 Connecticut Reports, 265.) By the constitution of the United States the Supreme Court is vested with "appellate jurisdiction, both as to law and fact, with such exceptions, and under such regulations, as the Congress shall make." This provision is held not to create but only to authorize the creation of the jurisdiction. In the words of Chancellor Kent, "If congress had not provided any rule to regulate the proceedings in appeal, the court could not exercise an appellate jurisdiction: and, if a rule be provided, the court could not depart from it." In pursuance of this principle, the Supreme Court decided in _Clarke_ v. _Bazadone_ that a writ of error did not lie to that court from a court of the United States territory north-west of the Ohio, because the act had not authorized an appeal or writ of error from such a court (_Commentaries_, i. 324). The appellate jurisdiction of the court is now regulated by title 13 chap. ii. of the Revised Statutes of the United States (1873), SS 690-710; and by the acts enumerated at p. 901 of the Revised Statutes, United St
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   115   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139  
140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
appeal
 

United

 

States

 

appellate

 

jurisdiction

 
reached
 

conclusions

 

points

 

proceedings

 

Reports


hearing

 

provided

 

reviewing

 

decided

 
original
 

Supreme

 

admiralty

 
equity
 
higher
 

Statutes


Revised
 

Congress

 
Connecticut
 

Chancellor

 

constitution

 

regulations

 

exceptions

 

congress

 

create

 

vested


creation

 
authorize
 
provision
 

territory

 

regulated

 

enumerated

 

Commentaries

 

authorized

 

principle

 

Clarke


pursuance

 

depart

 

exercise

 

Bazadone

 
regulate
 

affecting

 

review

 
length
 
evidence
 

reported