FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156  
157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   >>   >|  
many poetical extracts, I find two stanzas of the poem quoted as written by Barnfield,--probably Richard. These two writers were of Raleigh's time, but I think their claims may be readily dismissed. Supposing that "The Lie" was written by either Joshua Sylvester or Sir Walter Raleigh, I shall try to show that it was not written by Sylvester, and that he has wrongfully enjoyed the credit of its authorship. Critics and collators have for years been doubting about the authorship of this little poem, written over two centuries and a half ago; and, so far as I can ascertain, not one of them has ever discovered, what is the simple fact, that there were _two_ poems instead of _one_, similar in scope and spirit, but still two poems,--"The Lie" _and_ "The Soul's Errand." I have said that Sir Egerton Brydges alludes to a "parody" of "The Lie," in Sylvester's volume, there called "The Soul's Errand." In that volume I find what Sir Egerton calls a "parody." It is, in reality, another poem, bearing the title of "The Soul's Errand," consisting of _twenty_ stanzas, all of four lines each, excepting the first stanza, which has six. "The Lie" consists of but _thirteen_ stanzas, of six lines each, the fifth and sixth of which may be termed the refrain or burden of the piece. I annex copies of the two poems; Sir Walter's (so called) is taken from Percy's "Reliques," and Sylvester's is copied from his own folio. On comparing the two pieces, it will be seen that they begin alike, and go on nearly alike for a few stanzas, when they diverge, and are then entirely different from each other to the end. I do not find that this difference has ever been pointed out, and am therefore left to suppose that it never was discovered. At this late day conjectures are not worth much, but it would appear that, the opening stanzas of the two poems being similar, their identity was at some time carelessly taken for granted by some collector, who read only the initial stanzas, and thus ignorantly deprived Sir Walter of "The Lie," and gave it to Sylvester, with the title of "The Soul's Errand." This, however, is certain: "The Soul's Errand," so called, of _thirteen_ stanzas, given to us by Ellis and by Chambers as Sylvester's, is not the poem that Sylvester wrote under that title, and we have his own authority for saying so. His poem of _twenty_ stanzas, bearing that title, does not appear to have ever been reprinted, and it is believed cannot now be
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156  
157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

stanzas

 

Sylvester

 

Errand

 
written
 

Walter

 
called
 

discovered

 

volume

 

thirteen

 

parody


Egerton

 

bearing

 

twenty

 

similar

 

Raleigh

 
authorship
 

difference

 

pointed

 
authority
 

believed


reprinted

 

pieces

 

comparing

 

diverge

 

Chambers

 

initial

 

opening

 
deprived
 

ignorantly

 

carelessly


granted
 

identity

 
suppose
 

collector

 

conjectures

 

credit

 
Critics
 

enjoyed

 

wrongfully

 

collators


centuries

 

doubting

 

Barnfield

 

Richard

 
quoted
 

extracts

 

poetical

 
writers
 

Supposing

 

Joshua