FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   >>   >|  
eckett, Jackson and others, to be examined? If not, are _any_ conjectural emendations of the last and present centuries to be given? Where is the line to be drawn? A mere selection is valueless, or next to valueless; because, setting aside the differences in opinion in such matters, we want to know what conjectures are new, and which are old? 3. Are the various readings suggested in periodicals to be given? 4. Can any positive and practical rules be furnished, likely to render such an undertaking useful and successful? J. O. HALLIWELL. * * * * * Minor Notes. _Local Rhymes, Kent._-- "Between Wickham and Welling There's not an honest man dwelling; And I'll tell you the reason why, Because Shooters' Hill's so nigh." Unless this is preserved in "N. & Q." it will probably be forgotten with the highwaymen, whose proceedings at Shooters' Hill, no doubt, originated it. G. W. SKYRING. _Samuel Pepys's Grammar._--I have lately been looking over the _Diary_ of this very clever person, and I confess it has surprised me to find him, a graduate of Cambridge, and, in fact, I may say a man of letters, constantly employing such vulgar bad grammar as "he _do_ say," and such like. I am the more surprised when, on looking at his letters, even the familiar ones to his cousin Roger and to W. Hewer, I can find nothing of the kind, they being as grammatical and as well written as any of the time. My hypothesis is--LORD BRAYBROOKE can correct me if I am wrong--that Pepys, writing his _Diary_ in short-hand, used one and the same character for all the persons of the present tense of _do_, and that the decypherer did not attend to this circumstance. In his letter to Col. Legge (vol. v. p. 296.), Pepys writes "His R. H. _does_ think," &c., which in the _Diary_ would surely be "His R. H. _do_ think," &c. In a similar way I would account for the use of _come_ instead of _came_ in the _Diary_, as there is nothing of the kind in the Letters. Should I be right, I may have rendered a slight service to the memory of an able and worthy man. THOS. KEIGHTLEY. _Roman Remains._--In Wright's _Celt, Roman, and Saxon_, p. 207., a curious Roman altar, dedicated to Silvanus, "ab aprum eximiae forme captum," is mentioned as found at Durham. It was found in the wild district to the west, in the neighbourhood of Stanhope in Weardale, and is preserve in the rectory house there. P. 330., figure A. This
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   13   14   15   16   17   18   19   20   21   22   23   24   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37  
38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Shooters

 

surprised

 
letters
 
valueless
 
present
 

letter

 

circumstance

 

persons

 

decypherer

 

attend


conjectural

 

examined

 

surely

 

emendations

 

centuries

 
writes
 

character

 
written
 

hypothesis

 
grammatical

BRAYBROOKE

 

correct

 
similar
 

writing

 

account

 

eckett

 

mentioned

 

Durham

 

captum

 

Silvanus


eximiae

 
district
 

figure

 

rectory

 

preserve

 

neighbourhood

 

Stanhope

 

Weardale

 

dedicated

 

Should


Letters

 

rendered

 

slight

 

service

 

memory

 

Wright

 
curious
 
Remains
 
Jackson
 

worthy