FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458  
459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   >>   >|  
ttack upon the spirit, freedom, dignity, independence, and sovereignty of South Carolina, we are unable to conceive. That this has any connection with, or relation to Puritanism, we believe is above y'r Excellency's comprehension as it is above ours. We should be sincerely sorry to do any thing inconsistent with the Union of the States, which is and must continue to be the basis of our Liberties and Independence; on the contrary we wish it may be strengthened, confirmed, and endure for ever."[603] By the Treaty of Peace in 1783, Negroes were put in the same category with horses and other articles of property.[604] "Negroes [says Mr. Hamilton], by the laws of the States, in which slavery is allowed, are personal property. They, therefore, on the principle of those laws, like horses, cattle and other movables, were liable to become booty--and belonged to the enemy, [captor] as soon as they came into his hands. Belonging to him, he was free either to apply them to his own use, or set them at liberty. If he did the latter, the grant was irrevocable, restitution was impossible. Nothing in the laws of nations or in those of Great Britain, will authorize the resumption of liberty, once granted to a human being."[605] On the 6th of May, 1783, Gen. Washington wrote Sir Guy Carleton:-- "In the course of our conversation on this point, I was surprised to hear you mention, that an embarkation had already taken place, in which a large number of negroes had been carried away. Whether this conduct is consonant to, or how far it may be deemed an infraction of the treaty, is not for me to decide. I cannot, however, conceal from you, that my private opinion is, that the measure is totally different from the letter and spirit of the treaty. But waiving the discussion of the point, and leaving its decision to our respective sovereigns; I find it my duty to signify my readiness, in conjunction with your Excellency, to enter into any agreement, or take any measures, which may be deemed expedient, to prevent the future carrying away of any negroes, or other property of the American inhabitants."[606] In his reply, dated New York, May 12, 1783, Sir Guy Carleton says,-- "I enclose a copy of an order, which I have given out to prevent the carrying
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458  
459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   471   472   473   474   475   476   477   478   479   480   481   482   483   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

property

 

deemed

 

negroes

 

treaty

 

Negroes

 

horses

 
Carleton
 

liberty

 
spirit
 

Excellency


carrying

 
prevent
 
States
 
inhabitants
 

agreement

 
mention
 

number

 
surprised
 

embarkation

 

conversation


granted
 

Washington

 

conjunction

 

American

 

measures

 

expedient

 

carried

 

private

 
decision
 

conceal


respective

 

opinion

 

measure

 

waiving

 

letter

 

leaving

 

totally

 

sovereigns

 
consonant
 
conduct

Whether
 

discussion

 
readiness
 
signify
 

enclose

 
decide
 

future

 

infraction

 

continue

 
Liberties