FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445  
446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   >>   >|  
term common law began to be used in a third sense, as the correlative of chancery law. This, however, having been long after Prisot's time, could not have been the sense in which he used the term. He must have meant the ancient _lex, non scripta_, because, had he used it as inclusive of the _lex scripta_, he would have put his finger on the statute which had enjoined on the judges a deference to the laws of holy church. But no such statute existing, he must have referred to the common law in the sense of a _lex non scripta_. Whenever, then, the term common law is used in either of these senses, and it is never employed in any other, it is readily known in which of them by the context and subject matter under consideration; which, in the present case, leave no room for doubt. I do not remember the occasion which led me to take up this subject, while a practitioner of the law. But I know I went into it with all the research which a very copious law library enabled me to indulge; and I fear not for the accuracy of any of my quotations. The doctrine might be disproved by many other and different topics of reasoning; but having satisfied myself of the origin of the forgery, and found how, like a rolling snow-ball, it had gathered volume, I leave its further pursuit to those who need further proof, and perhaps I have already gone further than the feeble doubt you expressed might require, I salute you with great esteem and respect. Th: Jefferson. LETTER CLXXXIV.--TO JOSEPH C. CABELL, January 11, 1825 TO JOSEPH C. CABELL. Monticello, January 11, 1825. Dear Sir, We are dreadfully nonplussed here by the non-arrival of our three Professors. We apprehend that the idea of our opening on the 1st of February prevails so much abroad (although we have always mentioned it doubtfully), as that the students will assemble on that day without awaiting the further notice which was promised. To send them away will be discouraging, and to open an University without Mathematics or Natural Philosophy would bring on us ridicule and disgrace. We therefore publish an advertisement, stating that on the arrival of these Professors, notice will be given of the day of opening the institution. Governor Barbour writes me hopefully of getting our fifty thousand dollars from Congress. The proposition has been originated in the House of Representatives, referred to the committee of claims, the chairman of which has prepared a very favo
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432   433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   443   444   445  
446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464   465   466   467   468   469   470   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

scripta

 

common

 

arrival

 
Professors
 

referred

 
opening
 

notice

 
subject
 

statute

 
CABELL

January

 
JOSEPH
 
respect
 
esteem
 

nonplussed

 
Jefferson
 

salute

 

expressed

 

abroad

 
require

LETTER

 

Monticello

 
dreadfully
 

February

 

prevails

 

CLXXXIV

 

apprehend

 

University

 

thousand

 

writes


Barbour

 

stating

 

institution

 
Governor
 

dollars

 

claims

 
chairman
 

prepared

 
committee
 

Representatives


Congress

 
proposition
 

originated

 
advertisement
 

publish

 

promised

 
awaiting
 

mentioned

 

doubtfully

 

students