FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326  
327   328   329   330   331   332   >>  
to, and the previous question having been ordered, the amendment was agreed to and the committee raised by a vote of 145 yeas to 38 nays; the negative vote coming, in the main, from the more pronounced anti-slavery men. [Sidenote] "Globe," Dec. 4, 1860, p. 7. [Sidenote] Ibid. [Sidenote] Ibid. [Sidenote] Ibid. [Sidenote] Ibid. [Sidenote] "Globe," Dec. 4, 1860. p. 7. [Illustration: JUSTIN S. MURPHY.] Though this was the first roll-call of the session, the disunion conspirators, one after another, made haste to declare the treasonable attitude of their States. Pending the vote, Mr. Singleton declined recording his name for the reason that Mississippi had called a convention to consider this subject. He was not sent here for the purpose of making any compromise or to patch up existing difficulties. Mr. Jones, of Georgia, said he did not vote on this question because his State, like Mississippi, had called a convention to decide all these questions of Federal relations. Mr. Hawkins, of Florida, said his people had resolved to determine, in convention in their sovereign capacity, the time, place, and manner of redress. It was not for him to take any action on the subject. His State was opposed to all and every compromise. The day of compromise was past. Mr. Clopton, of Alabama, declined voting because the State of Alabama is proceeding to consider in a convention what action is required to maintain her rights, honor, and safety. Believing that a State has the right to secede, and that the only remedy for present evils is secession, he would not hold out any delusive hope or sanction any temporizing policy. Mr. Miles, of South Carolina, said "the South Carolina delegation have not voted on this question because they conceive they have no interest in it. We consider our State as already withdrawn from the confederacy in everything except form." Mr. Pugh, of Alabama, said: "As my State of Alabama intends following South Carolina out of the Union by the 10th of January next, I pay no attention to any action taken in this body." [Sidenote] "Globe," Dec. 10, 1860, p. 36, 37. These proceedings occurred on the second day of the session, December 4; two days later the Speaker announced the committee, placing at the head, as chairman, Thomas Corwin, of Ohio, and appointing such members from the different States as to make it of marked influence and ability; the disunion faction being distinctly rec
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   321   322   323   324   325   326  
327   328   329   330   331   332   >>  



Top keywords:
Sidenote
 

convention

 

Alabama

 

action

 

compromise

 

Carolina

 

question

 

called

 
subject
 

Mississippi


States

 

declined

 

disunion

 

committee

 
session
 

marked

 

ability

 

interest

 

conceive

 

delegation


influence

 

temporizing

 
secede
 

remedy

 

present

 
safety
 

Believing

 

secession

 

policy

 
sanction

distinctly

 
delusive
 
faction
 

proceedings

 
occurred
 

attention

 

December

 
announced
 

placing

 

Speaker


chairman

 
Thomas
 

intends

 

confederacy

 

members

 

rights

 
January
 
Corwin
 
appointing
 

withdrawn