FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233  
234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   >>   >|  
It is wearisome to be under the necessity, or at least the constant temptation, of attacking Socinianism, in reviewing a work professedly written against Methodism. Surely such a work ought to treat of those points of doctrine and practice, which are peculiar to Methodism. But to publish a 'diatribe' against the substance of the Articles and Catechism of the English Church, nay, of the whole Christian world, excepting the Socinians, and to call it "Hints concerning the dangerous and abominable absurdities of Methodism," is too bad. Ib. p. 43. But this Calvinistic Evangelist tells us, by way of accounting for the utter impossibility of producing in himself either faith or repentance, that both are of divine origin, and like the light, and the rain, and the dew of heaven, which tarrieth not for man, neither waiteth for the sons of men, are from above, and come down from the Father of lights, from whom alone cometh every good and perfect gift! Is the Barrister--are the Socinian divines--inspired, or infallibly sure that it is a crime for a Christian to understand the words of Christ in their plain and literal sense, when a Socinian chooses to give his paraphrase,--often, too, as strongly remote from the words, as the old spiritual paraphrases on the Song of Solomon? Ib. p. 46. According to that Gospel which hath hitherto been the pillar of the Christian world, we are taught that whosoever endeavours to the best of his ability to reform his manners, and amend his life, will have pardon and acceptance. As interpreted by whom? By the Socini, or the Barrister?--Or by Origen, Chrysostom, Jerome, the Gregories, Eusebius, Athanasius?--By Thomas Aquinas, Bernard, Thomas-a-Kempis?--By Luther, Melancthon, Zuinglius, Calvin?--By the Reformers and martyrs of the English Church?--By Cartwright and the learned Puritans?--By Knox?--By George Fox?--With regard to this point, that mere external evidence is inadequate to the production of a saving faith, and in the majority of other opinions, all these agree with Wesley. So they all understood the Gospel. But it is not so! 'Ergo', the Barrister is infallible. Ib. p. 47. 'When the wicked man turneth away from the wickedness which he hath committed, and doeth that which is lawful and right, he shall save his soul alive'. This gracious declaration the old moral divines of our Church have placed in the front of its Liturgy. In the name of
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   217   218   219   220   221   222   223   224   225   226   227   228   229   230   231   232   233  
234   235   236   237   238   239   240   241   242   243   244   245   246   247   248   249   250   251   252   253   254   255   256   257   258   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Church

 

Barrister

 

Christian

 

Methodism

 

Socinian

 

Thomas

 
English
 
divines
 

Gospel

 

Calvin


hitherto

 

Athanasius

 

Reformers

 

pillar

 

Eusebius

 

Aquinas

 

Luther

 

Melancthon

 

Gregories

 
Kempis

Bernard

 

Zuinglius

 

According

 

Jerome

 

acceptance

 

reform

 

ability

 

manners

 
pardon
 

martyrs


interpreted

 

Chrysostom

 

taught

 

whosoever

 

endeavours

 
Socini
 

Origen

 

evidence

 

lawful

 

committed


wickedness

 
wicked
 

turneth

 

Liturgy

 

gracious

 

declaration

 
infallible
 

external

 

Solomon

 
inadequate