FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117  
118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   >>  
e Case of Dr. Jekyll and Mr. Hyde_. A medical friend of Jefferies, Dr. Samuel Jones, {153b} has said, when speaking of his "ecstasies": "His is not the baneful, sensuous De Quincey opium-deliriation; he felt a purer delight than that which inspired the visions of Kubla Khan; he saw 'no damsel with a dulcimer,' but thrilled with yearning unspeakable for the 'fuller soul,' and felt in every trembling fibre of his frame the consciousness of incarnate immortality." This attempt to exalt Jefferies at the expense of De Quincey and Coleridge seems to me unfortunate. Enough has been said already in the remarks on De Quincey to show that the dreams of De Quincey were no mere opium dreams. De Quincey was a born dreamer, and from his earliest days had visions and ecstatic moods. The opium which he took (primarily at any rate to relieve pain, not, as Dr. Jones suggests, to excite sensuous imagery) undoubtedly intensified the dream faculty, but it did not produce it. I confess that I do not know quite what the Doctor means by preferring the "purer delight" of the Jefferies exaltation to the vision that produced _Kubla Khan_. If he implies that opium provoked the one and that "the pure breath of Nature" (to use his own phrase) inspired the other, and that the latter consequently is the purer delight, then I cannot follow his reasoning. A vision is not the less "pure" because it has been occasioned by a drug. One of the sublimest spiritual experiences that ever happened to a man came to John Addington Symonds after a dose of chloroform. Nitrous oxide, ether, Indian hemp, opium, these things have been the means of arousing the most wonderful states of ecstatic feeling. Then why should _Kubla Khan_ be rated as a less "pure" delight than one of the experiences retailed in _The Story of my Heart_? Is our imagination so restricted that it cannot enjoy both the subtleties of Coleridge and the fuller muse of Jefferies? The healing power of Nature has never found happier expression than in _The Story of my Heart_. In words of simple eloquence he tells us how he cured the weariness and bitterness of spirit by a journey to the seashore. "The inner nature was faint, all was dry and tasteless; I was weary for the pure fresh springs of thought. Some instinctive feeling uncontrollable drove me to the sea. . . . Then alone I went down to the sea. I stood where the foam came to my feet, and looked out over
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   113   114   115   116   117  
118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   >>  



Top keywords:

Quincey

 
Jefferies
 

delight

 

dreams

 

fuller

 

experiences

 
Nature
 

vision

 

ecstatic

 

feeling


Coleridge

 

visions

 

inspired

 
sensuous
 
things
 

states

 

wonderful

 

arousing

 

happened

 

looked


sublimest
 

spiritual

 
Addington
 

Symonds

 
Nitrous
 
retailed
 

chloroform

 

Indian

 

springs

 
weariness

eloquence
 
thought
 
bitterness
 
spirit
 

tasteless

 

nature

 

journey

 

seashore

 

simple

 
restricted

imagination

 

uncontrollable

 

instinctive

 
subtleties
 

happier

 

expression

 

healing

 
immortality
 

attempt

 

incarnate