FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191  
192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   >>   >|  
response, "I would go to the principal and explain." Answers of this type are always unsatisfactory. _Question c (Playmate hits you)_ _Satisfactory responses_ are only those which suggest either excusing or overlooking the act. These ideas are variously expressed as follows: "I would excuse him" (about half of all the correct answers). "I would say 'yes' if he asked my pardon." "I would say it was all right." "I would take it for a joke." "I would just be nice to him." "I would go right on playing." "I would take it kind-hearted." "I would not fight or run and tell on him." "I would not blame him for it." "Ask him to be more careful," etc. _Unsatisfactory responses_ are all those not of the above two types; as: "I would hit them back." "I would not hit them back, but I would get even some other way." "Tell them not to do it again." "Tell them to 'cut it out.'" "Tell him it's a wrong thing to do." "Make him excuse himself." "Make him say he's sorry." "Would not play with him." "Tell my mamma." "I would ask him why he did it." "He'd say 'excuse me' and I'd say 'thank you.'" "He should excuse me." "He is supposed to say 'excuse me.'" REMARKS. All three comprehension questions of this year were used by Binet, Goddard, Huey, and others in year X; two of them in the "easy series" and one in the "hard series." The Stanford data show that they belong at the 8-year level on the standard of scoring above set forth. The three differ little among themselves in difficulty, but all of them are decidedly easier than the other five used by Binet. It would be absurd to go on using the comprehension questions as Binet bunched them, eight together, ranging in difficulty from one which is easy enough for 6-year intelligence ("What's the thing to do if you miss your train?") to one which is hard for the 12-year level ("Why is a bad act done when one is angry more excusable than the same act done when one is not angry?"). VIII, 4. GIVING SIMILARITIES; TWO THINGS PROCEDURE. Say to the child: "_I am going to name two things which are alike in some way, and I want you to tell me how they are alike. Wood and coal: in what way are they alike?_" Proceed in the same manner with:-- _An apple and a peach._ _Iron and silver._ _A ship and an automobile._ After the first pair the formula may be abbreviated to "_In what way are ... and ...
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   191  
192   193   194   195   196   197   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   210   211   212   213   214   215   216   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

excuse

 

comprehension

 

questions

 
responses
 
difficulty
 

series

 
differ
 

scoring

 

standard

 

intelligence


easier
 

decidedly

 

absurd

 

ranging

 

bunched

 
silver
 

Proceed

 

manner

 

abbreviated

 
formula

automobile

 
GIVING
 

SIMILARITIES

 

excusable

 

THINGS

 

PROCEDURE

 

things

 
response
 

hearted

 

playing


careful

 

Playmate

 

Unsatisfactory

 

Satisfactory

 

correct

 

answers

 

variously

 

overlooking

 

suggest

 

excusing


pardon

 

Question

 

Goddard

 

expressed

 

Answers

 

supposed

 
REMARKS
 

explain

 

belong

 

principal