FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141  
142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   >>   >|  
nterpretation. The pictures used in the Stanford revision have been selected from a number which have been tried because they are more uniform in this respect than most others in use. However, they are not without their differences, picture _b_, for example, tending more than the others to provoke description. There seems to be no disagreement as to the proper location of this test. III, 4. GIVING SEX PROCEDURE. If the subject is a boy, the formula is: "_Are you a little boy or a little girl?_" If a girl, "_Are you a little girl or a little boy?_" This variation in the formula is necessary because of the tendency in young children to repeat mechanically the last word of anything that is said to them. If there is no response, say: "_Are you a little girl?_" (if a boy); or, "_Are you a little boy?_" (if a girl). If the answer to the last question is "no" (or a shake of the head), we then say: "_Well, what are you? Are you a little boy or a little girl?_" (or _vice versa_). SCORING. The response is satisfactory if it indicates that the child has really made the discrimination, but we must be cautious about accepting any other response than the direct answer, "A little girl," or, "A little boy." "Yes" and "no" in response to the second question must be carefully checked up. REMARKS. Binet and Goddard say that 3-year-olds cannot pass this test and that 4-year-olds almost never fail. We can accept the last part of this statement, but not the first part. Nearly all of our 3-year-old subjects succeed with it. The test probably has nothing to do with sex consciousness, as such. Success in it would seem to depend on the ability to discriminate between familiar class names which are in a certain degree related. III, 5. GIVING THE FAMILY NAME PROCEDURE. The child is asked, "_What is your name?_" If the answer, as often happens, includes only the first name (Walter, for example), say: "_Yes, but what is your other name? Walter what?_" If the child is silent, or if he only repeats the first name, say: "_Is your name Walter ... ?_" (giving a fictitious name, as Jones, Smith, etc.). This question nearly always brings the correct answer if it is known. SCORING. Simply + or -. No attention is paid to faults of pronunciation. REMARKS. There is unanimous agreement that this test belongs in the 3-year group. Although the child has not had as much opportunity to learn the family name as his first name, he is almost
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141  
142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

answer

 
response
 

Walter

 

question

 

REMARKS

 

formula

 
SCORING
 
PROCEDURE
 

GIVING

 
depend

belongs

 

family

 

discriminate

 

familiar

 

Although

 

ability

 

subjects

 

succeed

 
opportunity
 

Success


consciousness

 

includes

 

brings

 

correct

 
silent
 

repeats

 
fictitious
 

giving

 

Nearly

 
related

degree

 

pronunciation

 

unanimous

 

faults

 

FAMILY

 

Simply

 
attention
 

agreement

 

discrimination

 

disagreement


proper

 

description

 

provoke

 

tending

 
location
 
children
 

repeat

 

tendency

 
subject
 

variation