FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143  
144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   >>   >|  
wholesome practical maxims, as if they flowed from theoretical premisses that were in truth utterly incompatible with them. FOOTNOTES: [151] Delandine's _Couronnes Academiques, ou Recueil de prix proposes par les Societes Savantes_. (Paris, 2 vols., 1787.) [152] Musset-Pathay has collected the details connected with the award of the prize, ii. 365-367. [153] Second Letter to M. de Malesherbes, p. 358. Also _Conf._, viii. 135. [154] Diderot's account (_Vie de Seneque_, sect. 66, _Oeuv._, iii. 98; also ii. 285) is not inconsistent with Rousseau's own, so that we may dismiss as apocryphal Marmontel's version of the story (_Mem._ VIII.), to the effect that Rousseau was about to answer the question with a commonplace affirmative, until Diderot persuaded him that a paradox would attract more attention. It has been said also that M. de Francueil, and various others, first urged the writer to take a negative line of argument. To suppose this possible is to prove one's incapacity for understanding what manner of man Rousseau was. [155] _Conf._, ix. 232, 233. [156] _Rousseau Juge de Jean Jacques, Dialogues_, i. 252. [157] _Dialogues_, i. 275, 276. [158] _Conf._, viii. 138. [159] "It made a kind of revolution in Paris," says Grimm. _Corr. Lit._, i. 108. [160] _Rep. au Roi de Pologne_, p. 111 and p. 113. [161] _Rep. a M. Bordes_, 138. [162] _Ib._ 137. [163] "The first source of the evil is inequality; from inequality come riches ... from riches are born luxury and idleness; from luxury come the fine arts, and from idleness the sciences." _Rep. au Roi de Pologne_, 120, 121. [164] _Rep. a M. Bordes_, 147. In the same spirit he once wrote the more wholesome maxim, "We should argue with the wise, and never with the public." _Corr._, i. 191. [165] _Rep. au Roi de Pologne_, 128, 129. [166] _Rep. a M. Bordes_, 150-161. [167] P. 174. [168] Egger's _Hellenisme en France_, 28ieme lecon, p. 265. [169] Voltaire to J.J.R. Aug. 30, 1755. [170] _Rep. au Roi de Pologne_, 105. [171] In 1753 the French Academy, by way no doubt of summoning a counter-blast to Rousseau, boldly offered as the subject of their essay the thesis that "The love of letters inspires the love of virtue," and the prize was won fitly enough by a Jesuit professor of rhetoric. See Delandine, i. 42. [172] Preface to _Narcisse_, 251. [173] _Rep. a M. Bordes_, 167. [174] P. 187. [175] See for instance a strange discussio
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140   141   142   143  
144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   166   167   168   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
Rousseau
 

Pologne

 

Bordes

 
Diderot
 

riches

 

inequality

 

luxury

 

idleness

 

Dialogues

 

Delandine


wholesome

 
professor
 

rhetoric

 
Jesuit
 
sciences
 

virtue

 

spirit

 

instance

 

strange

 

discussio


revolution

 

Preface

 

Narcisse

 

source

 

offered

 
boldly
 

subject

 

Voltaire

 

28ieme

 

French


Academy

 

counter

 
summoning
 

France

 

letters

 

public

 

inspires

 

Hellenisme

 

thesis

 

Second


Letter
 
Malesherbes
 

collected

 

Pathay

 

details

 
connected
 

inconsistent

 
account
 
Seneque
 

Musset