FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140  
141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   >>   >|  
would be impossible to prove that life was utterly extinct, when Alice seemed to die, 'as the clock in the distant village tolled one, just before' Ravenswood's experience. We do not, like him, postulate 'a breach in the laws of nature,' only a possible example of a law. The tale was not 'unfolded to the ear,' as the telepathic impact only affected the sense of sight. Here, perhaps, ought to follow a reply to certain scientific criticisms of the theory that telepathy, or the action of one distant mind, or brain, upon another, may be the cause of 'coincidental hallucinations,' whether among savage or civilised races. But, not to delay the argument by controversy, the Reply to Objections has been relegated to the Appendix[18]. [Footnote 1: The lady, her husband, and the lawyer, all known to me, gave me the story in writing; the servant's sister has been lost sight of.] [Footnote 2: See three other cases in _Proceedings_, S.P.R., ii. 122, 123. Two others are offered by Mr. Henry James and Mr. J. Neville Maskelyne of the Egyptian Hall.] [Footnote 3: See 'Phantasms of the Living' and 'A Theory of Apparitions,' _Proceedings_, S.P.R., vol. ii., by Messrs. Gurney and Myers.] [Footnote 4: _Studies in Psychical Research,_ p. 388.] [Footnote 5: This, at least, scorns to myself a not illogical argument. Mr. Leaf has argued on the other side, that 'Darwinism may have done something for Totemism, by proving the existence of a great monkey kinship. But Totemism can hardly be quoted as evidence for Darwinism.' True, but Darwinism and Totemism are matters of opinion, not facts of personal experience. To a believer in coincidental hallucinations, at least, the alleged parallel experiences of savages must yield some confirmation to his own. His belief, he thinks, is warranted by human experience. On what does he suppose that the belief of the savage is based? Do his experience and their belief coincide by pure chance?] [Footnote 6: _Prim. Cult._ i. 449.] [Footnote 7: Ibid. i. 450.] [Footnote 8: _Prim. Cult._ vol. i. p. 450.] [Footnote 9: From Shortland's _Traditions of New Zealand,_ p. 140.] [Footnote 10: Gurney and Myers, 'Phantasms of the Living,' vol. ii. ch. v. p. 557.] [Footnote 11: _The 'Adventure' and 'Beagle,'_ iii. 181, cf. 204.] [Footnote 12: It will, of course, be said that they worked their stories into conformity.] [Footnote 13: _Prim. Cult._ i. 116.] [Footnote 14: Polack's _Manners of the Ne
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   116   117   118   119   120   121   122   123   124   125   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   138   139   140  
141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Footnote

 

experience

 

Totemism

 

Darwinism

 

belief

 

Proceedings

 

coincidental

 

savage

 
hallucinations
 

distant


Phantasms
 

Living

 

Gurney

 
argument
 

believer

 
parallel
 
alleged
 

experiences

 

personal

 

savages


proving

 

argued

 
scorns
 

illogical

 
existence
 

matters

 

opinion

 

evidence

 
quoted
 

monkey


kinship

 

Beagle

 

Adventure

 

Polack

 

Manners

 

conformity

 

worked

 

stories

 
suppose
 
coincide

confirmation

 

thinks

 

warranted

 

chance

 

Shortland

 

Traditions

 

Zealand

 

affected

 

impact

 

telepathic