FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102  
>>  
erstand, my dear Chamberlain, what exactly in Pitt's policy you now question? CHAMBERLAIN. Nothing: I can't see far enough ahead to question anything. I only say, when does history begin to get written? We don't know. DIST. V. What more can one do than direct it for the generation in which one lives? That, it seems to me, is our main responsibility. CHAMBERLAIN. Well, that's what you and I have done. How? Mainly by pulling down bigger men than ourselves. Randolph, Parnell, Gladstone--we got the better of them, didn't we? Have you never wondered why men of genius get sent into the world--only to be defeated? Gladstone was a bigger man than the whole lot of us; but we pulled him down--and I enjoyed doing it. Parnell, for all his limitations, was a great man. Well, we got him down too. And I confess that gave me satisfaction. You helped to pull Randolph down; but you didn't enjoy doing it. That's where you and I were different. DIST. V. I helped? CHAMBERLAIN. Yes; it had to be done. And you were sorry for him while you did it--just as you were sorry for Wyndham. DIST. V. But I did nothing! CHAMBERLAIN. Quite so. He came down here to fight us in the Central division, and the Conservatives were keen for it. It was touch and go: Unionists were not in such close alliance then; he might have succeeded. You did nothing; wouldn't back him. (Quite right, from my point of view.) Randolph went down: never the same man again. DIST. V. But, my dear Chamberlain, we had our agreed compact. CHAMBERLAIN. An official understanding, certainly. But that didn't prevent me from going to the Round-Table conference. That also was touch and go; it might have succeeded. Where would our compact have been, then? DIST. V. The Round-Table was merely an interrogation covering a forlorn hope. It failed because you remained loyal to your convictions. CHAMBERLAIN. It failed because one day two of us lost our tempers--one bragged, the other bullied. That was the real reason. If Gladstone had given me a large enough hand over his first Bill, d'you suppose I shouldn't have been a Home Ruler? I was to begin with, remember. DIST. V. Standing for a very different Bill, I imagine. CHAMBERLAIN. Which you would still have opposed. But I should have won. DIST. V. Certainly, if we had lost you, it would have made a difference. CHAMBERLAIN. I was younger then: I'd more push in me. But you would have let me go, all the same. Yes, I've al
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102  
>>  



Top keywords:
CHAMBERLAIN
 

Gladstone

 

Randolph

 
succeeded
 
Parnell
 
compact
 

helped

 

failed

 

Chamberlain

 

question


bigger
 
opposed
 

prevent

 

conference

 

imagine

 

younger

 

Standing

 

remember

 

difference

 

Certainly


official
 

understanding

 

agreed

 
convictions
 

remained

 
tempers
 
bullied
 

reason

 

bragged

 

interrogation


covering

 

suppose

 
forlorn
 
shouldn
 

direct

 
generation
 

responsibility

 

wondered

 

Mainly

 

pulling


Nothing

 

policy

 
erstand
 

written

 
history
 
genius
 

Central

 

Wyndham

 
division
 

Conservatives