FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   >>  
d beaten me. DIST. V. I--a type of success? My dear Chamberlain! In my wildest dreams, I aim only at safety; and if my hesitations have sometimes distressed you, they have been far more distressing to myself. You yourself, in a moment of friendly candour, once described me (so I was told) as the champion stick-in-the-mud. CHAMBERLAIN. So I did, and it's true. But I said "champion." If you hadn't been such a champion at it, the mud would have swallowed you up alive. Instead of that, you have made it a tower of defence against your enemies. That's why I regard you not only as so successful, but so British. DIST. V. May I, at least, claim that even for self-defence I have not slung it at my opponents? CHAMBERLAIN. No. Why waste it? It's your use, not your misuse of it that I so admire. If you hadn't been such a wonderful politician, you might have been a great statesman. DIST. V. Doesn't that rather indicate failure? CHAMBERLAIN. No. Sometimes the political world has no use for statesmen-- except to down them. Sometimes it prefers politicians, and perhaps rightly. Every age makes its own peculiar requirements; and those who find out when the political line is the better one to follow, are the successful ones. You and I have been--politicians; let's be honest and own it. And now my particular politics are over. Circumstances have emptied me out. That's different from mere failure. Great statesmen have been failures; we've seen them go down, you and I--too big, too far-seeing for their day. But they went down _full_, with all the weight of their great convictions and principles still to their credit. I'm empty. Time has played me out. That's the difference. DIST. V. I am confident that history will give a different verdict. CHAMBERLAIN. Will it? When exactly does history begin to get written? Is a man's reputation for statesmanship safe, even after a hundred years? What about Pitt? Can one be so sure of him now? His European policy may have been a blunder; his great work in Ireland may yet have to be reversed. DIST. V. In reversed circumstances, that may become logical. But what has held good for a hundred year, I should incline to regard as statesmanship. CHAMBERLAIN. "Held good"? Fetters a man can't break "hold good "; but they make a prisoner of him all the same. Policies have done that to nations before now. But would you, on that score, say of them that they have held good? DIST. V. But let me und
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   77   78   79   80   81   82   83   84   85   86   87   88   89   90   91   92   93   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101  
102   >>  



Top keywords:

CHAMBERLAIN

 

champion

 
politicians
 

hundred

 

failure

 

successful

 

regard

 

defence

 

statesmanship

 

political


statesmen

 
reversed
 
history
 

Sometimes

 
confident
 
nations
 

difference

 

played

 

failures

 

convictions


principles

 

credit

 

weight

 

written

 

blunder

 

European

 

policy

 

Fetters

 

circumstances

 
logical

incline

 

Ireland

 
verdict
 

reputation

 

prisoner

 
Policies
 

swallowed

 
British
 

enemies

 
Instead

candour

 

friendly

 

Chamberlain

 
wildest
 

dreams

 

success

 
beaten
 

safety

 

distressing

 
moment