FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49  
50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   >>   >|  
anent knowledge, on the other hand, is knowledge which confines itself entirely with those bounds; so that it cannot apply to anything but actual phenomena. As far as you are an individual, death will be the end of you. But your individuality is not your true and inmost being: it is only the outward manifestation of it. It is not the _thing-in-itself_, but only the phenomenon presented in the form of time; and therefore with a beginning and an end. But your real being knows neither time, nor beginning, nor end, nor yet the limits of any given individual. It is everywhere present in every individual; and no individual can exist apart from it. So when death comes, on the one hand you are annihilated as an individual; on the other, you are and remain everything. That is what I meant when I said that after your death you would be all and nothing. It is difficult to find a more precise answer to your question and at the same time be brief. The answer is contradictory, I admit; but it is so simply because your life is in time, and the immortal part of you in eternity. You may put the matter thus: Your immortal part is something that does not last in time and yet is indestructible; but there you have another contradiction! You see what happens by trying to bring the transcendental within the limits of immanent knowledge. It is in some sort doing violence to the latter by misusing it for ends it was never meant to serve. _Thrasymachos_. Look here, I shan't give twopence for your immortality unless I'm to remain an individual. _Philalethes_. Well, perhaps I may be able to satisfy you on this point. Suppose I guarantee that after death you shall remain an individual, but only on condition that you first spend three months of complete unconsciousness. _Thrasymachos_. I shall have no objection to that. _Philalethes_. But remember, if people are completely unconscious, they take no account of time. So, when you are dead, it's all the same to you whether three months pass in the world of consciousness, or ten thousand years. In the one case as in the other, it is simply a matter of believing what is told you when you awake. So far, then, you can afford to be indifferent whether it is three months or ten thousand years that pass before you recover your individuality. _Thrasymachos_. Yes, if it comes to that, I suppose you're right. _Philalethes_. And if by chance, after those ten thousand years have gone by, no one ever t
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   25   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49  
50   51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

individual

 

remain

 

thousand

 

knowledge

 

Thrasymachos

 
Philalethes
 

months

 

simply

 

immortal

 
answer

matter

 

limits

 
individuality
 

beginning

 

misusing

 

satisfy

 

chance

 

suppose

 

immortality

 
twopence

unconscious

 

completely

 

people

 

believing

 

violence

 

account

 

consciousness

 
condition
 

recover

 

Suppose


guarantee

 

indifferent

 

remember

 

objection

 
afford
 

complete

 

unconsciousness

 

presented

 
annihilated
 
present

phenomenon

 

bounds

 

confines

 

actual

 

inmost

 

outward

 

manifestation

 
phenomena
 

contradiction

 

indestructible