FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570  
571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   >>   >|  
tigation of insanity by Paul of Aegina, the Moslem treatment of the insane had been far more merciful than the system prevailing throughout Christendom.(382) (382) See D. H. Tuke, as above, p. 110; also Trelat, as already cited. In 1792--the same year in which Pinel began his great work in France--William Tuke began a similar work in England. There seems to have been no connection between these two reformers; each wrought independently of the other, but the results arrived at were the same. So, too, in the main, were their methods; and in the little house of William Tuke, at York, began a better era for England. The name which this little asylum received is a monument both of the old reign of cruelty and of the new reign of humanity. Every old name for such an asylum had been made odious and repulsive by ages of misery; in a happy moment of inspiration Tuke's gentle Quaker wife suggested a new name; and, in accordance with this suggestion, the place became known as a "Retreat." From the great body of influential classes in church and state Tuke received little aid. The influence of the theological spirit was shown when, in that same year, Dr. Pangster published his Observations on Mental Disorders, and, after displaying much ignorance as to the causes and nature of insanity, summed up by saying piously, "Here our researches must stop, and we must declare that 'wonderful are the works of the Lord, and his ways past finding out.'" Such seemed to be the view of the Church at large: though the new "Retreat" was at one of the two great ecclesiastical centres of England, we hear of no aid or encouragement from the Archbishop of York or from his clergy. Nor was this the worst: the indirect influence of the theological habit of thought and ecclesiastical prestige was displayed in the Edinburgh Review. That great organ of opinion, not content with attacking Tuke, poured contempt upon his work, as well as on that of Pinel. A few of Tuke's brother and sister Quakers seem to have been his only reliance; and in a letter regarding his efforts at that time he says, "All men seem to desert me."(383) (383) See D. H. Tuke, as above, p. 116-142, and 512; also the Edinburgh Review for April, 1803. In this atmosphere of English conservative opposition or indifference the work could not grow rapidly. As late as 1815, a member of Parliament stigmatized the insane asylums of England as the shame of the nation; an
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   546   547   548   549   550   551   552   553   554   555   556   557   558   559   560   561   562   563   564   565   566   567   568   569   570  
571   572   573   574   575   576   577   578   579   580   581   582   583   584   585   586   587   588   589   590   591   592   593   594   595   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

England

 

theological

 

influence

 

insane

 

Edinburgh

 

insanity

 

ecclesiastical

 
Retreat
 
Review
 

received


asylum

 

William

 

thought

 

prestige

 

indirect

 

displayed

 

clergy

 

wonderful

 

researches

 

declare


finding

 

centres

 

encouragement

 

Church

 

Archbishop

 

sister

 

English

 

atmosphere

 

conservative

 
opposition

indifference

 
stigmatized
 

asylums

 

nation

 

Parliament

 

member

 

rapidly

 
desert
 

contempt

 
poured

opinion

 

content

 

attacking

 

brother

 

efforts

 

Quakers

 

reliance

 
letter
 
results
 
arrived