FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432  
433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   >>  
voice, 'How do you know, how do you know?' while the old man yelled at the top of his voice, 'Because I know.' Yet he would have you believe he said 'How do you know?' in such a meek and mild tone that he could not hurt anyone's feelings. He is not sincere when he says that the State's Attorney and Mr. Hynes and Mr. Ingham are engaged in a conspiracy, and when he abuses the witnesses on the stand and charges them with perjury and lying, he knows in his heart that it is not true. He has made insinuations against that big-hearted Irishman sitting there, Mr. Hynes, of bullying witnesses, which he knows is untrue. There is not a man who practices before the bar of Chicago who is more lenient with the witness than is Mr. Hynes, and there is not a man at the bar who will get more out of him than will Mr. Hynes. You, gentlemen, heard his cross-examination of the defendants' experts, and his examination of the witnesses who came to the stand, and I will leave it to you to decide, and not to Forrest, if he abused the witnesses on the stand. For three days this learned counsel for the defense stood before you twelve gentlemen and had no stock in trade; not a word to say in their defense beyond abusing and scandalizing the men who are trying this case, and who are seeing that the people of this great State are not misrepresented. He stood here and maliciously abused Mr. Hynes, whose only effort and desire has been that the guilty men, if they are guilty, shall be punished, and it is my duty as an officer of the State, to explain this matter to you and to hurl back the insinuations at the man who made them. "He told you further that I had made a blunder, but he did not tell you how many blunders he had made. He told you I had made a blunder with the same force that he tells you that Mertes lied when he testified that he saw Coughlin at the Carlson cottage, and when he tells you that, his clients have not been proved guilty, notwithstanding all our witnesses' lies. Suppose what he says about Mertes and his knowing it was May 4th is proved, what difference does it make whether it was on the night of May 4th or not. But he does put this man Kunze and Dan Coughlin together at the Carlson cottage. He puts Coughlin in the cottage and Kunze driving him there, a
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   408   409   410   411   412   413   414   415   416   417   418   419   420   421   422   423   424   425   426   427   428   429   430   431   432  
433   434   435   436   437   438   439   440   441   442   >>  



Top keywords:

witnesses

 

Coughlin

 
cottage
 

guilty

 

Mertes

 

abused

 

insinuations

 

Carlson

 

blunder

 

gentlemen


defense

 
examination
 
proved
 

matter

 
desire
 
effort
 

officer

 

explain

 

people

 

punished


misrepresented

 

maliciously

 

driving

 

difference

 

knowing

 

Suppose

 

blunders

 

clients

 

notwithstanding

 
testified

conspiracy

 

abuses

 
charges
 

engaged

 

Ingham

 
sincere
 

Attorney

 
perjury
 

hearted

 
Irishman

sitting

 

feelings

 

Because

 
yelled
 

bullying

 

counsel

 
twelve
 

learned

 

abusing

 
scandalizing