FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165  
166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   >>   >|  
other portions require different handling. Therefore good speakers usually combine two or more of these plans. Partition could hardly be used throughout an entire speech without ruining its interest. It occurs usually early to map out the general field or scope. Definition also is likely to be necessary at the beginning of an explanation to start the audience with clear ideas. It may be resorted to at various times later whenever a new term is introduced with a meaning the audience may not entirely understand. Both partition and definition are short, so they are combined with other forms. Examples, likewise, may be introduced anywhere. The two most frequently closely combined are comparison and contrast. Each seems to require the other. Having shown how two things or ideas are alike, the speaker naturally passes on to secure more definiteness by showing that with all their likenesses they are not exactly the same, and that the differences are as essential to a clear comprehension of them as the similarities. So usual are they that many people accept the two words as meaning almost the same thing, though in essence they are opposites. The other orders cannot be used in such close combinations but they may be found in varying degrees in many extended speeches of explanation as the nature of the material lends itself to one treatment or another. A twelve-hundred word discussion of _The Future of Food_ uses examples, contrasted examples, effect to cause, cause to effect (the phrase beginning a paragraph is "there is already evidence that this has resulted in a general lowering "), while the succeeding parts grow in significance until the last is the most important. A great English statesman in a speech lasting some three hours on a policy of government employed the following different methods at various places where he introduced expository material--partition (he claimed it was classification, but he listed for consideration only three of the essential five choices), contrast, comparison, time, example, place, cause to effect. Some of these methods of arranging explanatory matter were used several times. EXERCISES 1. Explain a topic by giving three examples. The class should comment upon their value. 2. Explain to the class some mechanical operation or device. The class after listening should decide which method the speaker used. 3. Explain some principle of government or society following the time orde
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   141   142   143   144   145   146   147   148   149   150   151   152   153   154   155   156   157   158   159   160   161   162   163   164   165  
166   167   168   169   170   171   172   173   174   175   176   177   178   179   180   181   182   183   184   185   186   187   188   189   190   >>   >|  



Top keywords:
effect
 

Explain

 

examples

 
introduced
 
contrast
 
methods
 

government

 

combined

 

meaning

 

partition


speaker
 
require
 

material

 

essential

 

comparison

 

audience

 

beginning

 

explanation

 

general

 

speech


resulted
 

succeeding

 

lowering

 
principle
 

important

 
significance
 
society
 

Future

 

discussion

 

twelve


hundred

 

contrasted

 
English
 
evidence
 

paragraph

 
giving
 

phrase

 

lasting

 

decide

 

consideration


listed

 

classification

 
operation
 

arranging

 
choices
 
device
 

listening

 

claimed

 
mechanical
 

policy