FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   >>  
of the kind[37]. [Footnote 37: I notice these alterations, because the original service is very rare, and consequently accessible only to a few.] The service of 1662, like the original, was framed to commemorate one event only, namely, the deliverance from the gunpowder plot; but when King William came to the throne, it was deemed desirable, as he had landed on the same day, to commemorate that event also. It became necessary, therefore, to alter the service so as to make it suit both events; _first_, the deliverance from the gunpowder treason; and _secondly_, the deliverance of the country from popish tyranny and superstition by the arrival of King William. It has been supposed, that the service was altered into its present state by the convocation in 1689; but there is no evidence to prove that such was the case. It seems pretty certain that it was altered by the authority of the crown. A twofold deliverance, therefore, is commemorated in the present _service_ for the Fifth of November; _first_, from the powder plot, and _next_, from popery coming in upon the country in a manner more insidious, but not less dangerous in 1688, when the king on the throne was a papist, and all possible means were used to establish the papal ascendancy. It was very natural, that the country should have been struck with the circumstance of King William's landing on the Fifth of November,--a day so remarkable in the calendar of the English church. To the Roman Catholics the observance of this day is anything but agreeable; but they can scarcely censure Englishmen for commemorating an event so favourable to Protestantism. Had such a conspiracy been discovered against the church of Rome, all papists would regard the day with special reverence. Protestants are surely to be permitted to enjoy the same liberty, in celebrating the merciful interposition of Providence in rescuing the country from destruction. By some modern writers, the _Revolution_ of 1688 is designated a _Rebellion_! It is astonishing, that any Protestant should speak of that event in such terms; since Queen Victoria must be an usurper, if the revolution was a rebellion. To the principles then established, our queen is indebted for her crown; and we are indebted to the same principles, for our civil and religious liberties. The men, who can call the revolution a rebellion, cannot be members of the church of England; for had not King James been expelled from
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   94   95   96   97   98   99   100   101   102   103   104   105   106   107   108   109   110   111   112   >>  



Top keywords:
service
 

deliverance

 

country

 
William
 
church
 
revolution
 

original

 

November

 

altered

 

indebted


rebellion
 
gunpowder
 

principles

 

commemorate

 

present

 

throne

 

surely

 

regard

 

reverence

 

Protestants


papists
 

special

 

Englishmen

 
agreeable
 

observance

 
English
 
Catholics
 

scarcely

 

censure

 

conspiracy


discovered

 

Protestantism

 
permitted
 
commemorating
 

favourable

 
Protestant
 

established

 

Victoria

 

usurper

 

religious


members

 

England

 
expelled
 

liberties

 
rescuing
 
destruction
 

Providence

 

interposition

 
liberty
 

celebrating