FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>  
titative prevision is reached deductively; induction can achieve only qualitative prevision." Now, if we remember that the very first accurate quantitative law of physical phaenomena ever established, the law of the accelerating force of gravity, was discovered and proved by Galileo partly at least by experiment; that the quantitative laws on which the whole theory of the celestial motions is grounded, were generalized by Kepler from direct comparison of observations; that the quantitative law of the condensation of gases by pressure, the law of Boyle and Mariotte, was arrived at by direct experiment; that the proportional quantities in which every known substance combines chemically with every other, were ascertained by innumerable experiments, from which the general law of chemical equivalents, now the ground of the most exact quantitative previsions, was an inductive generalization; we must conclude that Mr Spencer has committed himself to a general proposition, which a very slight consideration of truths perfectly known to him would have shown to be unsustainable. Again, in the very pamphlet in which Mr Spencer defends himself against the supposition of being a disciple of M. Comte ("The Classification of the Sciences," p. 37), he speaks of "M. Comte's adherent, Mr Buckle." Now, except in the opinion common to both, that history may be made a subject of science, the speculations of these two thinkers are not only different, but run in different channels, M. Comte applying himself principally to the laws of evolution common to all mankind, Mr Buckle almost exclusively to the diversities: and it may be affirmed without presumption, that they neither saw the same truths, nor fell into the same errors, nor defended their opinions, either true or erroneous, by the same arguments. Indeed, it is one of the surprising things in the case of Mr Buckle as of Mr Spencer, that being a man of kindred genius, of the same wide range of knowledge, and devoting himself to speculations of the same kind, he profited so little by M. Comte. These oversights prove nothing against the general accuracy of Mr Spencer's acquirements. They are mere lapses of inattention, such as thinkers who attempt speculations requiring that vast multitudes of facts should be kept in recollection at once, can scarcely hope always to avoid. [8] We refer particularly to the mystical metaphysics connected with the negative sign, imaginary quantities, infi
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   126   127   128   129   130   131   132   133   134   135   136   137   >>  



Top keywords:
Spencer
 

quantitative

 

Buckle

 
speculations
 
general
 
truths
 

quantities

 

direct

 

experiment

 

common


thinkers
 
prevision
 

defended

 

erroneous

 

opinions

 

affirmed

 

evolution

 

mankind

 

diversities

 

exclusively


presumption
 

arguments

 

channels

 
applying
 

principally

 
errors
 
recollection
 

scarcely

 

attempt

 

requiring


multitudes

 

negative

 
connected
 
imaginary
 

metaphysics

 
mystical
 

inattention

 

genius

 

knowledge

 

devoting


kindred

 

surprising

 
things
 

profited

 
acquirements
 
accuracy
 

lapses

 

oversights

 
Indeed
 

disciple