FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295  
296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   >>   >|  
er primitive character at this time appears in the account of her marriages with animals, in which there is to be recognized the trace of the old zooelatrous period; but as patron of fertility she becomes in time a great goddess and takes on universal attributes--she is the mother of gods and men, universal protector and guide. Where war was the chief pursuit she became a goddess of war; in this character she appears in Babylonia as early as the time of Hammurabi, and later in Assyria. In the genealogical constructions she was brought into connection, as daughter, wife, or other relation, with any god that the particular conditions suggested. As the Assyrians grew morally she was endowed with all the highest virtues (so in the Penitential Psalms), and occupied so preeminent a position that under favorable circumstances she might perhaps have become the only god of the land. +763+. If her name signified originally 'lord' or 'lady,' the occurrence of several Ishtars in Assyria (particularly Ishtar of Nineveh and Ishtar of Arbela) is easily understood; so in Canaan, as we learn from the Old Testament, there was a great number of local Ashtarts.[1308] We can thus also explain the male deities Ashtar in Moab and Athtar in South Arabia.[1309] None of these, however, attained the eminence of the Babylonian and Assyrian Ishtar; her supremacy in Mesopotamia was due doubtless in part to the political importance of the cities that adopted her. She had her rivals, as we have seen, in Marduk and Ashur and others; and that she was able to maintain herself is to be ascribed in some measure to the importance attached by her worshipers to the fertilizing power of nature. +764+. The other Semitic peoples, with the exception of the Hebrews, offer little material for tracing the development of the great gods. For the Aramean region the records are sparse; Aramean deities appear to be of the same character as the Canaanite.[1310] In Canaan (including Phoenicia) out of the vast number of local divinities, the Baals and Ashtarts, few attained to eminence, and it is doubtful whether any one of them deserves the title "great."[1311] The divine patrons of cities were locally powerful; such were the Baal of Tyre, called Melkart ('the king of the city'), the Ashtart of Sidon, and Tanit of Carthage;[1311] these owed their reputation to their official positions, and there is no other record of their development. The same thing is true of the Moab
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   271   272   273   274   275   276   277   278   279   280   281   282   283   284   285   286   287   288   289   290   291   292   293   294   295  
296   297   298   299   300   301   302   303   304   305   306   307   308   309   310   311   312   313   314   315   316   317   318   319   320   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Ishtar

 

character

 
eminence
 

attained

 
Assyria
 

deities

 

Ashtarts

 
number
 

development

 

cities


Aramean

 

importance

 

Canaan

 
appears
 

universal

 

goddess

 
Carthage
 

Marduk

 

maintain

 

fertilizing


nature
 

worshipers

 
ascribed
 
measure
 

attached

 
record
 

supremacy

 

Mesopotamia

 

Assyrian

 

Babylonian


doubtless

 

adopted

 

reputation

 
official
 

political

 

positions

 

rivals

 

peoples

 

divinities

 

called


Phoenicia

 

deserves

 
locally
 

divine

 

doubtful

 

powerful

 

including

 

material

 

tracing

 
Hebrews