FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50  
51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   >>   >|  
ornamental details. Q. What is observable with respect to Norman masonry? A. In general the walls are faced on each side with a thin shell of ashlar or cut stone, whilst the intervening space, which is sometimes considerable, is filled with grouted rubble. Masses of this grout-work masonry, from which the facing of cut stone has been removed, we often find amongst ruined edifices of early date. Q. Were there any buttresses used at this period? [Illustration: Norman Buttress, Chancel of St. Mary's, Leicester.] A. Yes; but the walls being enormously thick, and requiring little additional support, those in use are like pilasters, with a broad face projecting very little from the building; and they seem to have been derived from the pilaster strips of stonework in Anglo-Saxon masonry. They are generally of a single stage only, but sometimes of more, and are not carried up higher than the cornice, under which they often but not always finish with a slope. They appear as if intended rather to relieve the plain external surface of the wall than to strengthen it. Norman portals not unfrequently occur, formed in the thickness of a broad but shallow pilaster buttress, as at Iffley Church, Oxfordshire, and at Stoneleigh and Hampton-in-Arden Churches, Warwickshire, and elsewhere. This kind of buttress was also used in the next, or Semi-Norman style. Q. Were there any towers? A. Yes; they were generally very low and massive; and the exterior, especially of the upper story, was often decorated with arcades of blank semicircular and intersecting arches; the parapet consisted of a plain projecting blocking-course, supported by the corbel table. Q. Do pinnacles appear to have been known to the Normans? A. Although some are of opinion that the pinnacle was not introduced till after the adoption of the pointed style, many Norman buildings have pinnacles of a conical shape, which are apparently part of the original design. Q. What distinction occurs in the construction of the small country churches of this style, and the larger buildings of conventual foundation? A. Small Norman churches consisted of a single story only; cathedral and conventual churches were carried up to a great height, and were frequently divided into three tiers, the lowest of which consisted of single arches, separating the nave from the aisles: above each of these arches in the second tier were two smaller arches constructed beneath a larger; s
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   26   27   28   29   30   31   32   33   34   35   36   37   38   39   40   41   42   43   44   45   46   47   48   49   50  
51   52   53   54   55   56   57   58   59   60   61   62   63   64   65   66   67   68   69   70   71   72   73   74   75   >>   >|  



Top keywords:

Norman

 

arches

 

churches

 

consisted

 

single

 
masonry
 

buttress

 

buildings

 

carried

 

pilaster


generally
 

pinnacles

 

projecting

 

conventual

 

larger

 

semicircular

 

arcades

 
decorated
 

intersecting

 

aisles


separating

 

lowest

 

parapet

 

constructed

 

beneath

 

Churches

 
Warwickshire
 
exterior
 

blocking

 
massive

towers

 

smaller

 

adoption

 
Hampton
 

pointed

 

foundation

 

introduced

 

conical

 
occurs
 

distinction


original

 

construction

 

apparently

 

country

 

pinnacle

 

cathedral

 
corbel
 
supported
 

design

 

divided