FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   >>  
the virtuous man does good to mankind. St. Paul was right to tell you that charity prevails over faith and hope. But shall only those that are useful to one's fellow-creature be admitted as virtues? How can I admit any others? We live in society; really, therefore, the only things that are good for us are those that are good for society. A recluse will be sober, pious; he will be clad in hair-cloth; he will be a saint: but I shall not call him virtuous until he has done some act of virtue by which other men have profited. So long as he is alone, he is doing neither good nor evil; for us he is nothing. If St. Bruno brought peace to families, if he succoured want, he was virtuous; if he fasted, prayed in solitude, he was a saint. Virtue among men is an interchange of kindness; he who has no part in this interchange should not be counted. If this saint were in the world, he would doubtless do good; but so long as he is not in the world, the world will be right in refusing him the title of virtuous; he will be good for himself and not for us. But, you say to me, if a recluse is a glutton, a drunkard, given to secret debauches with himself, he is vicious; he is virtuous, therefore, if he has the opposite qualities. That is what I cannot agree: he is a very disagreeable fellow if he has the faults you mention; but he is not vicious, wicked, punishable as regards society to whom these infamies do no harm. It is to be presumed that were he to return to society he would do harm there, that he would be very vicious; and it is even more probable that he would be a wicked man, than it is sure that the other temperate and chaste recluse would be a virtuous man, for in society faults increase, and good qualities diminish. A much stronger objection is made; Nero, Pope Alexander VI., and other monsters of this species, have bestowed kindnesses; I answer hardily that on that day they were virtuous. A few theologians say that the divine emperor Antonine was not virtuous; that he was a stubborn Stoic who, not content with commanding men, wished further to be esteemed by them; that he attributed to himself the good he did to the human race; that all his life he was just, laborious, beneficent through vanity, and that he only deceived men through his virtues. "My God!" I exclaim. "Give us often rogues like him!" _WHY?_ Why does one hardly ever do the tenth part of the good one might do? Why in half Europe do girls pra
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   198   199   200   201   202   203   204   205   206   207   208   209   >>  



Top keywords:

virtuous

 

society

 

vicious

 

recluse

 
interchange
 
fellow
 

faults

 

wicked

 

qualities

 

virtues


increase

 
diminish
 

kindnesses

 

infamies

 
species
 

bestowed

 
chaste
 
monsters
 
Alexander
 

objection


stronger

 

temperate

 
presumed
 

return

 

probable

 
exclaim
 

deceived

 

laborious

 
beneficent
 
vanity

rogues
 

Europe

 
divine
 
emperor
 

Antonine

 

stubborn

 

theologians

 

hardily

 
content
 

attributed


esteemed

 
commanding
 

wished

 

answer

 

counted

 

things

 

profited

 

virtue

 

prevails

 

charity