FREE BOOKS

Author's List




PREV.   NEXT  
|<   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464  
465   466   467   468   469   470   >>  
rigin in an age as yet free from the trammels of formal orthodoxy. Again it is a notable specimen of early Christian pseudepigraphy, and one which had manifold and far-reaching results. Finally the romance to which it owed much of its popular appeal, became, through the medium of Rufinus's Latin, the parent of the late medieval legend of Faust, and so the ancestor of a famous type in modern literature. LITERATURE.--For a full list of this down to 1904 see Hans Waitz, "Die Pseudoklementinen" (_Texte u. Untersuchungen zur Gesch. der altchr. Literatur, neue Folge_, Bd. x. Heft 4), and A. Harnack, _Chronologie der altchr. Litteratur_ (1904), ii. 518 f. In English, besides Hort's work, there are articles by G. Salmon, in _Dict. of Christ. Biog._, C. Bigg, _Studia Biblica_, ii., A.C. Headlam, _Journal of Theol. Studies_, iii. (J. V. B.) FOOTNOTES: [1] Dr Armitage Robinson, in his edition of the _Philocalia_ (extracts made c. 358 by Basil and Gregory from Origen's writings), proved that the passage cited below is simply introduced as a parallel to an extract of Origen's; while Dom Chapman, in the _Journal of Theol. Studies_, iii. 436 ff., made it probable that the passages in Origen's _Comm. on Matthew_ akin to those in the _Opus Imperf. in Matth._ are insertions in the former, which is extant only in a Latin version. Subsequently he suggested (_Zeitsch. f. N.T. Wissenschaft_, ix. 33 f.) that the passage in the _Philocalia_ is due not to its authors but to an early editor, since it is the only citation not referred to Origen. [2] While Hort and Waitz say c. 200, Harnack says c. 260. The reign of Gallienus (260-268) would suit the tone of its references to the Roman emperor (Waitz, p. 74), and also any polemic against the Neoplatonic philosophy of revelation by visions and dreams which it may contain. [3] Even Waitz agrees to this, though he argues back to a yet earlier anti-Pauline (rather than anti-Marcionite) form, composed in Caesarea, c. 135. [4] Dom Chapman maintains that the _Recognitions_ (c. 370-390,) even attack the doctrine of God in the _Homilies_ or their archetype. [5] Dom Chapman (ut supra, p. 158) says during the Neoplatonist reaction under Julian 361-363, to which period he also assigns the _Homilies_. CLEOBULUS, one of the Seven Sages of Greece, a native and tyrant of Lindus in Rhod
PREV.   NEXT  
|<   440   441   442   443   444   445   446   447   448   449   450   451   452   453   454   455   456   457   458   459   460   461   462   463   464  
465   466   467   468   469   470   >>  



Top keywords:

Origen

 

Chapman

 
altchr
 

Harnack

 

Philocalia

 

passage

 
Studies
 
Journal
 

Homilies

 

citation


referred
 
editor
 
CLEOBULUS
 

authors

 

Gallienus

 

period

 
Julian
 

assigns

 

Lindus

 

extant


version

 

insertions

 

Imperf

 

Subsequently

 

suggested

 

Greece

 

Wissenschaft

 

native

 

Zeitsch

 

tyrant


argues

 

earlier

 

doctrine

 

agrees

 

Pauline

 
Recognitions
 
maintains
 

Caesarea

 

Marcionite

 

composed


emperor
 
Neoplatonist
 

attack

 

reaction

 

references

 

philosophy

 
revelation
 

visions

 
dreams
 

Neoplatonic